These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813635)

  • 21. Fatty acid fouling of forward osmosis membrane: Effects of pH, calcium, membrane orientation, initial permeate flux and foulant composition.
    Zhao P; Gao B; Yue Q; Liu P; Shon HK
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Aug; 46():55-62. PubMed ID: 27521936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
    Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preparation and assessment of carboxylate polyelectrolyte as draw solute for forward osmosis.
    Cui H; Zhang H; Jiang W; Yang F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5752-5761. PubMed ID: 29230651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
    Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mitigation of bidirectional solute flux in forward osmosis via membrane surface coating of zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotubes.
    Zou S; Smith ED; Lin S; Martin SM; He Z
    Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():104970. PubMed ID: 31295643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Novel organic draw solution in forward osmosis process for fertigation: performance evaluation and flux prediction.
    Al Bazedi G; Soliman N; Sewilam H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):68881-68891. PubMed ID: 35554813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of draw solution type and properties on the performance of forward osmosis process: Energy consumption and sustainable water reuse.
    Gulied M; Al Momani F; Khraisheh M; Bhosale R; AlNouss A
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 233():234-244. PubMed ID: 31176124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes.
    Coday BD; Heil DM; Xu P; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23363015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors affecting fluoride and natural organic matter (NOM) removal from natural waters in Tanzania by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis.
    Shen J; Schäfer AI
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 527-528():520-9. PubMed ID: 26005995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of pretreatment and membrane orientation on fluxes for concentration of whey with high foulants by using NH
    Seker M; Buyuksari E; Topcu S; Babaoglu DS; Celebi D; Keskinler B; Aydiner C
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 243():237-246. PubMed ID: 28672186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent: influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance.
    Li D; Zhang X; Simon GP; Wang H
    Water Res; 2013 Jan; 47(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 23103058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Influence of co-existing chloride on fluoride removal from drinking water by nanofiltration membrane].
    Ma WF; Liu WJ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 30(3):787-91. PubMed ID: 19432329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating the performance of hydroponic nutrient solutions as potential draw solutions for fertilizer drawn forward osmosis.
    Bassiouny M; Nasr P; Sewilam H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(30):46226-46242. PubMed ID: 35167023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Forward osmosis filtration for removal of organic foulants: Effects of combined tannic and alginic acids.
    Wang L; Zhang W; Chu H; Dong B
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():251-63. PubMed ID: 26803261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis.
    Li ZY; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Valladares-Linares R; Li Q; Zhan T; Amy G
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 22094000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of a nanofibrous composite membrane to the fertilizer-driven forward osmosis process for irrigation water use.
    An HK; Lee CG; Park SJ
    Environ Technol; 2017 Nov; 38(21):2700-2708. PubMed ID: 27973983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transport of trace organic compounds through novel forward osmosis membranes: Role of membrane properties and the draw solution.
    Sauchelli M; Pellegrino G; D'Haese A; Rodríguez-Roda I; Gernjak W
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 141():65-73. PubMed ID: 29778066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes.
    Ge Q; Su J; Amy GL; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(4):1318-26. PubMed ID: 22239906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scale-up of osmotic membrane bioreactors by modeling salt accumulation and draw solution dilution using hollow-fiber membrane characteristics and operation conditions.
    Kim S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():88-95. PubMed ID: 24746768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.