301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813738)
1. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.
Tsuchida Y; Katayama J; Murohashi H
Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22484011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
He C; Chen A
Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.
Lavie N; Hirst A; de Fockert JW; Viding E
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15355143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of cognitive control mechanisms in selective attention towards emotional stimuli.
Petrucci M; Pecchinenda A
Cogn Emot; 2017 Nov; 31(7):1480-1492. PubMed ID: 27690176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Memory guidance in distractor suppression is governed by the availability of cognitive control.
Wen W; Hou Y; Li S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 29582389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
Paas F; Adam JJ
Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does searching for faces among similar-looking distractors affect distractor memory?
McKinley GL; Peterson DJ; Hout MC
Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 36849759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
Koshino H
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of acute stress and perceptual load on distractor interference.
Sato H; Takenaka I; Kawahara JI
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 22463388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of cognitive load on neural and behavioral responses to smoking-cue distractors.
MacLean RR; Nichols TT; LeBreton JM; Wilson SJ
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):588-600. PubMed ID: 27012714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High bladder pressure reduces the ability to filter out interference from distractors in low perceptual load condition.
Gunduz H; Gunduz T; Ozkan Ceylan A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2219-2231. PubMed ID: 34892987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
