These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25813739)

  • 1. Converging evidence that common timing processes underlie temporal-order and simultaneity judgments: a model-based analysis.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1750-66. PubMed ID: 25813739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.
    Binder M
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():432-47. PubMed ID: 25982561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):820-46. PubMed ID: 22829342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects.
    Matthews N; Welch L; Achtman R; Fenton R; FitzGerald B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0145926. PubMed ID: 26756716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitting model-based psychometric functions to simultaneity and temporal-order judgment data: MATLAB and R routines.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):972-98. PubMed ID: 23572250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments.
    Vatakis A; Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 185(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 17962929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The left visual field attentional advantage: No evidence of different speeds of processing across visual hemifields.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():16-26. PubMed ID: 26261896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consistency of crossmodal synchrony perception across the visual, auditory, and tactile senses.
    Machulla TK; Di Luca M; Ernst MO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1026-38. PubMed ID: 27045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impaired timing of audiovisual events in the elderly.
    Bedard G; Barnett-Cowan M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):331-40. PubMed ID: 26474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal Metrics of Multisensory Processing Change in the Elderly.
    Basharat A; Mahoney JR; Barnett-Cowan M
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(8):715-744. PubMed ID: 31648192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):273-284. PubMed ID: 37932495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociating the sequential dependency of subjective temporal order from subjective simultaneity.
    Recio RS; Cravo AM; de Camargo RY; van Wassenhove V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223184. PubMed ID: 31596862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Roving Dual-Presentation Simultaneity-Judgment Task to Estimate the Point of Subjective Simultaneity.
    Yarrow K; Martin SE; Di Costa S; Solomon JA; Arnold DH
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():416. PubMed ID: 27047434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of visual apparent motion on audiovisual simultaneity.
    Kwon J; Ogawa K; Miyake Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110224. PubMed ID: 25295594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event timing in human vision: Modulating factors and independent functions.
    Arstila V; Georgescu AL; Pesonen H; Lunn D; Noreika V; Falter-Wagner CM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0226122. PubMed ID: 32853238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in audiovisual temporal processing in autistic adults are specific to simultaneity judgments.
    Regener P; Heffer N; Love SA; Petrini K; Pollick F
    Autism Res; 2024 May; 17(5):1041-1052. PubMed ID: 38661256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: effects of experimental method and stimulus type.
    van Eijk RL; Kohlrausch A; Juola JF; van de Par S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Aug; 70(6):955-68. PubMed ID: 18717383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli.
    Takeshima Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261129. PubMed ID: 34914735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of phasic alertness on temporal precision.
    Li Q; Liu P; Huang S; Huang X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):262-274. PubMed ID: 29047031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Somatosensory prior entry assessed with temporal order judgments and simultaneity judgments.
    Yates MJ; Nicholls ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1586-603. PubMed ID: 21487928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.