123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25814251)
1. Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthetic valve as a valid control in preclinical in vivo ovine studies.
Harvey L; Bianco R; Lahti M; Carney J; Zhang L; Robinson N
Eur J Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 759():192-9. PubMed ID: 25814251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced Integrity Preservation Technology Reduces Bioprosthesis Calcification While Preserving Performance and Safety.
De La Fuente AB; Wright GA; Olin JM; Duhay FG; Kapelak B; Bochenek M; Bartus K; Sadowski J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 26182627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trans-catheter valve-in-valve implantation: in vitro hydrodynamic performance of the SAPIEN+cloth trans-catheter heart valve in the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves.
Walther T; Dehdashtian MM; Khanna R; Young E; Goldbrunner PJ; Lee W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 21466959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trilogy pericardial valve: hemodynamic performance and calcification in adolescent sheep.
Flameng W; Meuris B; De Visscher G; Cunanan C; Lane E; Verbeken E; Herijgers P; Herregods MC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):587-92. PubMed ID: 18222270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new model to test the calcification characteristics of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Ozaki S; Herijgers P; Flameng W
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Feb; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15008695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vivo assessment of a photofixed bovine pericardial valve.
Svendsen CA; Kreykes NS; Butany J; Bianco RW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):813-20; discussion 820-1. PubMed ID: 11128791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic annulus diameter and valve design each determine the valve size implanted.
von Oppell UO; Segadal L; Busund R; Johnston GG; Dimitrakakis G; Masani N; Lung TH
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Sep; 21(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 23167223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?
Totaro P; Degno N; Zaidi A; Youhana A; Argano V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec; 130(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 16308014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic stability during 17 years of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis.
Banbury MK; Cosgrove DM; Thomas JD; Blackstone EH; Rajeswaran J; Okies JE; Frater RM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 May; 73(5):1460-5. PubMed ID: 12025820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Truly stentless molded autologous pericardial aortic valve prosthesis with single point attached commissures in a sheep model.
Goetz WA; Tan TE; Lim KH; Salgues Sle H; Grousson N; Xiong F; Chua YL; Yeo JH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 33(4):548-53. PubMed ID: 18243723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure of porcine aortic and bovine pericardial prosthetic valves: an experimental investigation in young sheep.
Barnhart GR; Jones M; Ishihara T; Chavez AM; Rose DM; Ferrans VJ
Circulation; 1982 Aug; 66(2 Pt 2):I150-3. PubMed ID: 7083535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis and the Hancock pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position].
Cohen-Solal A; Leroy G; Hittinger L; Fernandez F; Gay J; Gourgon R
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Mar; 79(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 3087318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.
König KC; Wahlers T; Scherner M; Wippermann J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 25076560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
