These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25814964)

  • 1. Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance.
    Meyer M; Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():235. PubMed ID: 25814964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STEM/Non-STEM Divide Structures Undergraduate Beliefs About Gender and Talent in Academia.
    Bailey KA; Horacek D; Worthington S; Nanthakumar A; Preston S; Ilie CC
    Front Sociol; 2019; 4():26. PubMed ID: 33869351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "You need to be super smart to do well in math!" Young children's field-specific ability beliefs.
    Jenifer JB; Jaxon J; Levine SC; Cimpian A
    Dev Sci; 2024 Jan; 27(1):e13429. PubMed ID: 37400969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
    Ceci SJ; Ginther DK; Kahn S; Williams WM
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2014 Dec; 15(3):75-141. PubMed ID: 26172066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Frequency of "Brilliant" and "Genius" in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields.
    Storage D; Horne Z; Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150194. PubMed ID: 26938242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beliefs in "Brilliance" and Belonging Uncertainty in Male and Female STEM Students.
    Deiglmayr A; Stern E; Schubert R
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1114. PubMed ID: 31191382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field-specific ability beliefs as an explanation for gender differences in academics' career trajectories: Evidence from public profiles on ORCID.Org.
    Hannak A; Joseph K; Larremore DB; Cimpian A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Oct; 125(4):681-698. PubMed ID: 37347899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.
    Leslie SJ; Cimpian A; Meyer M; Freeland E
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6219):262-5. PubMed ID: 25593183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lifting as we climb: Experiences and recommendations from women in neural engineering.
    Jantz MK; Mak J; Dalrymple AN; Farooqui J; Grigsby EM; Herrera AJ; Pirondini E; Collinger JL
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1104419. PubMed ID: 36968482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes.
    Cheryan S; Master A; Meltzoff AN
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():49. PubMed ID: 25717308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Undergraduate Lay Theories of Abilities: Mindset, universality, and brilliance beliefs uniquely predict undergraduate educational outcomes.
    Limeri LB; Carter NT; Lyra F; Martin J; Mastronardo H; Patel J; Dolan EL
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2023 Dec; 22(4):ar40. PubMed ID: 37751502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bachelor's to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: a 30-year analysis.
    Miller DI; Wai J
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():37. PubMed ID: 25741293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Where will I belong more?": The role of belonging comparisons between STEM fields in high school girls' STEM interest.
    Veldman J; Van Laar C; Thoman DB; Van Soom C
    Soc Psychol Educ; 2021; 24(5):1363-1387. PubMed ID: 34483710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".
    Ginther DK; Kahn S
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6246):391. PubMed ID: 26206926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.
    Wang MT; Degol JL
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2017 Mar; 29(1):119-140. PubMed ID: 28458499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
    Cheryan S; Ziegler SA; Montoya AK; Jiang L
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 143(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 27732018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unstable identity compatibility: how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
    Ahlqvist S; London B; Rosenthal L
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1644-52. PubMed ID: 23818652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female and male adolescents' subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors.
    Perez-Felkner L; McDonald SK; Schneider B; Grogan E
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Nov; 48(6):1658-73. PubMed ID: 22390658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equal Representation Does Not Mean Equal Opportunity: Women Academics Perceive a Thicker Glass Ceiling in Social and Behavioral Fields Than in the Natural Sciences and Economics.
    van Veelen R; Derks B
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():790211. PubMed ID: 35369222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Emphasis on Brilliance Fosters Masculinity-Contest Cultures.
    Vial AC; Muradoglu M; Newman GE; Cimpian A
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Apr; 33(4):595-612. PubMed ID: 35318861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.