These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25816344)
41. Review and comparative assessment of sequence-based predictors of protein-binding residues. Zhang J; Kurgan L Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):821-837. PubMed ID: 28334258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Scalable prediction of compound-protein interactions using minwise hashing. Tabei Y; Yamanishi Y BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 24564870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dissimilar Ligands Bind in a Similar Fashion: A Guide to Ligand Binding-Mode Prediction with Application to CELPP Studies. Xu X; Zou X Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 34830201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of Protein-Ligand Docking by Cyscore. Cao Y; Dai W; Miao Z Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():233-243. PubMed ID: 29594775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction. Brylinski M J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction. Huang B OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction. Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Accurate prediction of RNA-binding protein residues with two discriminative structural descriptors. Sun M; Wang X; Zou C; He Z; Liu W; Li H BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):231. PubMed ID: 27266516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Structure-based computational analysis of protein binding sites for function and druggability prediction. Nisius B; Sha F; Gohlke H J Biotechnol; 2012 Jun; 159(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 22197384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. LiGRO: a graphical user interface for protein-ligand molecular dynamics. Kagami LP; das Neves GM; da Silva AWS; Caceres RA; Kawano DF; Eifler-Lima VL J Mol Model; 2017 Oct; 23(11):304. PubMed ID: 28980073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Applications of the NRGsuite and the Molecular Docking Software FlexAID in Computational Drug Discovery and Design. Morency LP; Gaudreault F; Najmanovich R Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():367-388. PubMed ID: 29594781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening. Schomburg KT; Bietz S; Briem H; Henzler AM; Urbaczek S; Rarey M J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1676-86. PubMed ID: 24851945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Ligand binding site similarity identification based on chemical and geometric similarity. Tu H; Shi T Protein J; 2013 Jun; 32(5):373-85. PubMed ID: 23700221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]