These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25816465)
41. Navigating the information superhighway. Finding what you need on the Internet. Matthes N J Assoc Healthc Philanthr; 1999; ():12-4. PubMed ID: 10620870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Medical Crowdfunding for Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery. Durand WM; Johnson JR; Eltorai AEM; Daniels AH Orthopedics; 2018 Jan; 41(1):e58-e63. PubMed ID: 29156070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The importance of philanthropy in sustaining pediatric academic departments. Avila KC; Feigin RD J Pediatr; 2003 May; 142(5):457-8. PubMed ID: 12756371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Gift planning in the year 2010: imagine the unimaginable. Part III. Freeman DK Fund Raising Manage; 2001 Mar; 32(1):40-2, 46-8. PubMed ID: 11372483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. iapps brings a new generation of Web sites to the non-profit sector. Organizations capitalize on Web sites built with Orgitecture. Barnett S; Barnett F Fund Raising Manage; 1999 Jun; 30(4):19-23. PubMed ID: 10539311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Content strategy. Baker T Fund Raising Manage; 2001 Jul; 32(5):37, 40-1. PubMed ID: 11586865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The politics of evidence in online illness narratives: An analysis of crowdfunding for purported stem cell treatments. Tanner C; Munsie M; Sipp D; Turner L; Wheatland C Health (London); 2019 Jul; 23(4):436-457. PubMed ID: 30782021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Similarities and differences in philanthropic and federal support for medical research in the United States: an analysis of funding by nonprofits in 2006-2008. Myers ER; Alciati MH; Ahlport KN; Sung NS Acad Med; 2012 Nov; 87(11):1574-81. PubMed ID: 22914508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The future of planned giving: seniors and the online revolution. Davis D Fund Raising Manage; 2001 Apr; 32(2):6, 20, 33. PubMed ID: 11409088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Funding the way to open access. Terry R PLoS Biol; 2005 Mar; 3(3):e97. PubMed ID: 15760274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cutting through the e-maze: marketing strategy (Part II). Baker T Fund Raising Manage; 2001 Jun; 32(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 11521359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Silver Surfers. Can you afford to ignore seniors on the Web? Stelter L J Assoc Healthc Philanthr; 2001; ():10-2. PubMed ID: 11347192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Scaremongering Cancer Fund raising propaganda is unethical]. Finer D; Sachs L Lakartidningen; 2005 Sep 26-Oct 2; 102(39):2783-4; discussion 2784. PubMed ID: 16245554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Organ solicitation on the Internet: every man for himself? Appel JM; Fox MD Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):14; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 16092393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. "Of droughts and flooding rains": philanthropy for health and medical research. McGregor-Lowndes M; Scaife W Med J Aust; 2008 Jun; 188(11):631-2. PubMed ID: 18513170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Charities seek cut of drug royalties. Ledford H Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7356):275-6. PubMed ID: 21776052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. U.S. research spending. Sequester takes uneven bite from agency budgets. Cho A; Kaiser J; Mervis J Science; 2013 Sep; 341(6153):1437-8. PubMed ID: 24072895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]