These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25816755)

  • 41. Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden.
    Cederborg AC; Orbach Y; Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Oct; 24(10):1355-61. PubMed ID: 11075701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A national survey of child forensic interviewers: Implications for research, practice, and law.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):113-127. PubMed ID: 32175750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Eliciting accounts of alleged child sexual abuse: how do children report touch?
    Teoh YS; Pipe ME; Johnson ZH; Lamb ME
    J Child Sex Abus; 2014; 23(7):792-803. PubMed ID: 25101533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Children's Signaling of Incomprehension: The Diagnosticity of Practice Questions During Interview Instructions.
    Henderson HM; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33176442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Forensic Interviewers' Difficulty With Invitations: Faux Invitations and Negative Recasting.
    Henderson HM; Russo N; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2020 Aug; 25(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 31876172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Test balloons? Small signs of big events: a qualitative study on circumstances facilitating adults' awareness of children's first signs of sexual abuse.
    Flåm AM; Haugstvedt E
    Child Abuse Negl; 2013 Sep; 37(9):633-42. PubMed ID: 23899535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Talking past each other: Interviewer and child verbal exchanges in forensic interviews.
    Wolfman M; Brown D; Jose P
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 26844909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Setting course: the case for the credentialing of forensic interviewers.
    Haney M; Vieth VI; Campos HM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):709-27. PubMed ID: 21113836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Police interviews with child sexual abuse victims: patterns of reporting, avoidance and denial.
    Leander L
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Mar; 34(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 20206999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: a review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol.
    Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Hershkowitz I; Esplin PW; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007; 31(11-12):1201-31. PubMed ID: 18023872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of interviewer race and child race on sexual abuse disclosures in forensic interviews.
    Springman RE; Wherry JN; Notaro PC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2006; 15(3):99-116. PubMed ID: 16893821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reporting possible sexual abuse: a qualitative study on children's perspectives and the context for disclosure.
    Jensen TK; Gulbrandsen W; Mossige S; Reichelt S; Tjersland OA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2005 Dec; 29(12):1395-413. PubMed ID: 16293304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Disclosing the abuse: The effect of ethnoreligious identity on CSA disclosure in forensic interviews.
    Mordi H; Katz C; Tener D; Savaya R
    Child Abuse Negl; 2022 Feb; 124():105441. PubMed ID: 34952460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Children's use of sexual body part terms in witness interviews about sexual abuse.
    Burrows KS; Bearman M; Dion J; Powell MB
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Mar; 65():226-235. PubMed ID: 28189960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forensic interviewers' perceptions of the utility of mock interviews with trained actors as a training tool for child interviewing.
    Lawrie M; Brubacher SP; Powell MB; Boud D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2020 Aug; 106():104553. PubMed ID: 32464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. "It doesn't work at all, that's my experience": Swedish forensic interviewers' views on interpreter-mediated child interviews.
    Ernberg E; Magnusson M; Koponen L; Landström S
    Child Abuse Negl; 2022 May; 127():105540. PubMed ID: 35152056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The variability of practice in interviews used by professionals to investigate child sexual abuse.
    Davey RI; Hill J
    Child Abuse Negl; 1999 Jun; 23(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 10391514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Relationship Between Children's Age and Disclosures of Sexual Abuse During Forensic Interviews.
    Leach C; Powell MB; Sharman SJ; Anglim J
    Child Maltreat; 2017 Feb; 22(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 27784813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interviewing children versus tossing coins: accurately assessing the diagnosticity of children's disclosures of abuse.
    Lyon TD; Ahern EC; Scurich N
    J Child Sex Abus; 2012; 21(1):19-44. PubMed ID: 22339423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.