233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25816877)
1. Comparative bone tissue integration of nanostructured and microroughened dental implants.
Salou L; Hoornaert A; Stanovici J; Briand S; Louarn G; Layrolle P
Nanomedicine (Lond); 2015; 10(5):741-51. PubMed ID: 25816877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits.
Salou L; Hoornaert A; Louarn G; Layrolle P
Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():494-502. PubMed ID: 25449926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cytocompatibility and osseointegration of the Ti implants with XPEED® surfaces.
Lee SY; Yang DJ; Yeo S; An HW; Ryoo KH; Park KB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1283-9. PubMed ID: 22093072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The In Vivo Bone Response of Ultraviolet-Irradiated Titanium Implants Modified with Spontaneously Formed Nanostructures: An Experimental Study in Rabbits.
Shen J; Liu J; Chen X; Wang X; He F; Wang H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):776-84. PubMed ID: 27447142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits.
Johansson CB; Gretzer C; Jimbo R; Mattisson I; Ahlberg E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):943-53. PubMed ID: 21722190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early-stage osseointegration capability of a submicrofeatured titanium surface created by microroughening and anodic oxidation.
Yamada M; Ueno T; Minamikawa H; Ikeda T; Nakagawa K; Ogawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):991-1001. PubMed ID: 22726210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Azzawi ZGM; Hamad TI; Kadhim SA; Naji GA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Jun; 29(7):96. PubMed ID: 29946975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced bone-integration capability of alkali- and heat-treated nanopolymorphic titanium in micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy.
Ueno T; Tsukimura N; Yamada M; Ogawa T
Biomaterials; 2011 Oct; 32(30):7297-308. PubMed ID: 21742375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: a study in rabbits.
Lee J; Sieweke JH; Rodriguez NA; Schüpbach P; Lindström H; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 36(7):610-7. PubMed ID: 19538335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response.
Meirelles L; Melin L; Peltola T; Kjellin P; Kangasniemi I; Currie F; Andersson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 18384406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
