These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25817181)

  • 1. [Elective single embryo transfer policy at 48/72 h: which results after fresh transfers and frozen/thawed transfers?].
    Bottin P; Achard V; Courbiere B; Paci M; Gnisci A; Jouve E; Grillo JM; Paulmyer-Lacroix O
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Apr; 43(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 25817181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40-44 years.
    Niinimäki M; Suikkari AM; Mäkinen S; Söderström-Anttila V; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 23175499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
    Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: Should it be the rule?
    Clua E; Tur R; Coroleu B; Boada M; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 23069742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
    Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impact of age, single or double, fresh or frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization treatment].
    Wen GF; Jin XY; Wang ZL; Wei Q; Zhou F; Li C; Zhang SY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 93(33):2646-9. PubMed ID: 24360045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers.
    Fauque P; Jouannet P; Davy C; Guibert J; Viallon V; Epelboin S; Kunstmann JM; Patrat C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):927-35. PubMed ID: 19446806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Administering GnRH Agonists in the luteal phase of Artificial Cycle Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfers. A prospective randomized study].
    Gogce M; Benchaib M; Hadj S; Bordes A; du Menildot P; Lornage J; Salle B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Nov; 43(11):728-34. PubMed ID: 26297156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years.
    Veleva Z; Vilska S; Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2098-102. PubMed ID: 16740524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.
    Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prospective evaluation of elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience].
    Leniaud L; Poncelet C; Porcher R; Martin-Pont B; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Wolf JP; Sifer C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Feb; 36(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 18255330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Embryo quality is the main factor affecting cumulative live birth rate after elective single embryo transfer in fresh stimulation cycles.
    Niinimäki M; Veleva Z; Martikainen H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():131-5. PubMed ID: 26366790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles.
    Martikainen H; Orava M; Lakkakorpi J; Tuomivaara L
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1364-6. PubMed ID: 15105390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
    Yeung WS; Li RH; Cheung TM; Ng EH; Lau EY; Ho PC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2009 Dec; 15(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 19966345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst.
    Li Z; Sullivan EA; Chapman M; Farquhar C; Wang YA
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2048-54. PubMed ID: 26202917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan.
    Ishihara O; Araki R; Kuwahara A; Itakura A; Saito H; Adamson GD
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 24268706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: are they comparable with fresh?
    Mocanu EV; Cottell E; Waite K; Hennelly B; Collins C; Harrison RF
    Ir Med J; 2008 Jun; 101(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 18700513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reduction of multiple pregnancies in ART with large SET procedures over the period 2001-2010].
    Béraud E; Brugnon F; Gremeau AS; Dejou L; Pons H; Janny L; Boyer C; Pouly JL
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Jan; 41(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23291055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.