359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25817728)
1. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate.
Yilmaz HG; Boke F; Ayali A
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 25817728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.
Ueno D; Sekiguchi R; Morita M; Jayawardena A; Shinpo S; Sato J; Kobayashi K
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 24548316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of palatal mucosal thickness and location of the greater palatine foramen using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study.
Oduncuoğlu BF; Karslioğlu H; Karasu IN; Nisanci Yilmaz MN; Inonu E
Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 39(4):784-791. PubMed ID: 37584816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative analysis of maxillary palatal masticatory mucosa thickness and anatomical morphology of palatal vault in Zhejiang province.
Shen C; Gao B; Lyu K; Ye W; Yao H
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Feb; 51(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 35462468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Topographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars and maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography.
Yoshimine S; Nishihara K; Nozoe E; Yoshimine M; Nakamura N
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23114831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography.
Song JE; Um YJ; Kim CS; Choi SH; Cho KS; Kim CK; Chai JK; Jung UW
J Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):406-12. PubMed ID: 18315422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the neurovascular bundle position at the palate with cone beam computed tomography: an observational study.
Yilmaz HG; Ayali A
Head Face Med; 2015 Dec; 11():39. PubMed ID: 26714787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cephalometric measurements and cone-beam computed tomography-based measurements of palatal bone thickness.
Kim YJ; Lim SH; Gang SN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 24485730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
Garrett BJ; Caruso JM; Rungcharassaeng K; Farrage JR; Kim JS; Taylor GD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 18617096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age.
Wara-aswapati N; Pitiphat W; Chandrapho N; Rattanayatikul C; Karimbux N
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1407-12. PubMed ID: 11699483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Anatomic Analysis of Maxillary Posterior Teeth-Impact on Endodontic Microsurgery.
Lavasani SA; Tyler C; Roach SH; McClanahan SB; Ahmad M; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-5. PubMed ID: 27130335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.
Zhang W; Skrypczak A; Weltman R
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():65. PubMed ID: 26059796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
Silvestrini Biavati A; Tecco S; Migliorati M; Festa F; Panza G; Marzo G; Gherlone E; Tetè S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.
Baka ZM; Akin M; Ucar FI; Ileri Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25533073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location and severity of root resorption related to impacted maxillary canines: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation.
Doğramaci EJ; Sherriff M; Rossi-Fedele G; McDonald F
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 26219147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
