These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25818383)

  • 1. Costs of food waste in South Africa: Incorporating inedible food waste.
    de Lange W; Nahman A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():167-72. PubMed ID: 25818383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs of household food waste in South Africa.
    Nahman A; de Lange W; Oelofse S; Godfrey L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Nov; 32(11):2147-53. PubMed ID: 22608682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs of food waste along the value chain: evidence from South Africa.
    Nahman A; de Lange W
    Waste Manag; 2013 Nov; 33(11):2493-500. PubMed ID: 23910243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unlocking the resource potential of organic waste: a South African perspective.
    Greben HA; Oelofse SH
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Oct; 27(7):676-84. PubMed ID: 19470534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pricing landfill externalities: emissions and disamenity costs in Cape Town, South Africa.
    Nahman A
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):2046-56. PubMed ID: 21696939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technical, economic and environmental comparison of composting and anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal waste.
    Murphy JD; Power NM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(5):865-79. PubMed ID: 16702064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of food waste disposal options by LCC analysis from the perspective of global warming: Jungnang case, South Korea.
    Kim MH; Song YE; Song HB; Kim JW; Hwang SJ
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):2112-20. PubMed ID: 21612904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of the semi-aerobic landfill system (Fukuoka method) in developing countries: a Malaysia cost analysis.
    Chong TL; Matsufuji Y; Hassan MN
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(7):702-11. PubMed ID: 16009304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic and environmental analysis of four different configurations of anaerobic digestion for food waste to energy conversion using LCA for: a food service provider case study.
    Franchetti M
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 123():42-8. PubMed ID: 23583791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Search for a new economic optimum in the management of household waste in Tiaret city (western Algeria).
    Asnoune M; Abdelmalek F; Djelloul A; Mesghouni K; Addou A
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 27491370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of costs for three hypothetical alternative kitchen waste management systems.
    Schiettecatte W; Tize R; De Wever H
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1094-102. PubMed ID: 25341873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Home and community composting for on-site treatment of urban organic waste: perspective for Europe and Canada.
    Adhikari BK; Trémier A; Martinez J; Barrington S
    Waste Manag Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):1039-53. PubMed ID: 20571148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CCA-treated wood disposed in landfills and life-cycle trade-offs with waste-to-energy and MSW landfill disposal.
    Jambeck J; Weitz K; Solo-Gabriele H; Townsend T; Thorneloe S
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):S21-8. PubMed ID: 17416510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: performance assessment by mass and energy balance.
    Banks CJ; Chesshire M; Heaven S; Arnold R
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):612-20. PubMed ID: 20797849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techno-economic evaluation of a tandem dry batch, garage-style digestion-compost process for remote work camp environments.
    Hayes AC; Enongene Ekwe S; Mervin S; Jenson E
    Waste Manag; 2016 Dec; 58():70-80. PubMed ID: 27717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GHG emission factors developed for the collection, transport and landfilling of municipal waste in South African municipalities.
    Friedrich E; Trois C
    Waste Manag; 2013 Apr; 33(4):1013-26. PubMed ID: 23312780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.
    Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways.
    Khan MM; Jain S; Vaezi M; Kumar A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():548-564. PubMed ID: 26496882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing separate waste collection and mechanical biological waste treatment in South Africa: a comparison with Austria and England.
    Trois C; Simelane OT
    Waste Manag; 2010; 30(8-9):1457-63. PubMed ID: 20116993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration.
    Rabl A; Spadaro JV; Zoughaib A
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Apr; 26(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 18578154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.