327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25819645)
1. A Prospective Randomized Study of Pfannenstiel Versus Expanded Port Site Incision for Intact Specimen Extraction in Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy.
Binsaleh S; Madbouly K; Matsumoto ED; Kapoor A
J Endourol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):913-8. PubMed ID: 25819645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intact specimen extraction in laparoscopic nephrectomy procedures: Pfannenstiel versus expanded port site incisions.
Tisdale BE; Kapoor A; Hussain A; Piercey K; Whelan JP
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17320656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pfannenstiel incision for intact specimen extraction in laparoscopic transperitoneal radical nephrectomy: a longitudinal prospective outcome study.
Binsaleh S; Alomar M; Madbouly K
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2015 Jul; 70(7):475-80. PubMed ID: 26222816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Pfannenstiel or Extended Iliac Port Site Kidney Extraction in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Do We Have Consensus?
Iemsupakkul P; Kongchareonsombat W; Kijvikai K
Exp Clin Transplant; 2017 Apr; 15(2):138-142. PubMed ID: 28338459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is laparoendoscopic single-site surgery a viable approach for radical nephrectomy with renal vein thrombus? Comparison with multiport laparoscopy.
Liss MA; Park SK; Kopp RP; Raheem OA; Bazzi WM; Mehrazin R; Palazzi KL; Stroup SP; Derweesh IH
Urology; 2013 Jul; 82(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 23714202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic nephrectomy - Pfannenstiel or expanded port site specimen extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Amer T; Biju RD; Hutton R; Alsawi M; Aboumarzouk O; Hasan R; Clark R; Little B
Cent European J Urol; 2015; 68(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 26568875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized, prospective study of laparoendoscopic single-site plus one-port versus mini laparoscopic technique for live donor nephrectomy.
Lee KW; Choi SW; Park YH; Bae WJ; Choi YS; Ha US; Hong SH; Lee JY; Kim SW; Cho HJ
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):585-593. PubMed ID: 29396785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience.
McDougall E; Clayman RV; Elashry OM
J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1180-5. PubMed ID: 8632526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: assessment of morcellation versus intact specimen extraction on postoperative status.
Hernandez F; Rha KH; Pinto PA; Kim FJ; Klicos N; Chan TY; Kavoussi L; Jarrett TW
J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):412-5. PubMed ID: 12853788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: prospective assessment of impact of intact versus fragmented specimen removal on postoperative quality of life.
Gettman MT; Napper C; Corwin TS; Cadeddu JA
J Endourol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11890445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retroperitoneal Single Port Versus Transperitoneal Multiport Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.
Chauhan N; Kenwar DB; Singh N; Singh S; Sharma A; Kapoor K; Kumar S
J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):496-501. PubMed ID: 29641348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: a prospective, nonrandomized study.
Bazzi WM; Stroup SP; Kopp RP; Cohen SA; Sakamoto K; Derweesh IH
Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22990064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of kidney morcellation on operative time, incision complications, and postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Camargo AH; Rubenstein JN; Ershoff BD; Meng MV; Kane CJ; Stoller ML
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(3):273-9; discussion 279-80. PubMed ID: 16813669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of kidney retrieval incisions in laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy.
Gupta M; Singh P; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Kapoor R; Kumar A
Urol Int; 2008; 81(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 18931546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Radio Frequency Ablation Assisted Tumor Enucleation and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1a Renal Tumor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Huang J; Zhang J; Wang Y; Kong W; Xue W; Liu D; Chen Y; Huang Y
J Urol; 2016 Jun; 195(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 26905020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Gill IS; Cherullo EE; Meraney AM; Borsuk F; Murphy DP; Falcone T
J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):238-41. PubMed ID: 11743316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma.
Nelson CP; Wolf JS
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1989-94. PubMed ID: 11956425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for stage T1 and large stage T2 renal tumors.
Patel VR; Leveillee RJ
J Endourol; 2003 Aug; 17(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 12965063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized trial of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with and without hand assistance.
Bargman V; Sundaram CP; Bernie J; Goggins W
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):717-22. PubMed ID: 17094745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
