500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25819706)
61. The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives' antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial.
Gu C; Wu X; Ding Y; Zhu X; Zhang Z
Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1689-97. PubMed ID: 23735597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care.
Overgaard C; Fenger-Grøn M; Sandall J
Soc Sci Med; 2012 Apr; 74(7):973-81. PubMed ID: 22326105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. An antenatal prediction model for adverse birth outcomes in an urban population: The contribution of medical and non-medical risks.
Posthumus AG; Birnie E; van Veen MJ; Steegers EA; Bonsel GJ
Midwifery; 2016 Jul; 38():78-86. PubMed ID: 26616215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The effect of antenatal screening for depression on neonatal birthweight and gestation.
San Martin Porter MA; Kisely S; Betts KS; Alati R
Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):389-395. PubMed ID: 32622751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS): a programme of work to establish a research infrastructure to carry out national studies of uncommon conditions and events in midwifery units.
Rowe RE; Kurinczuk JJ; Hollowell J; Knight M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():77. PubMed ID: 27080858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Exploring the relationship between preterm placental calcification and adverse maternal and fetal outcome.
Chen KH; Chen LR; Lee YH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 20586039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups.
Hinton L; Dumelow C; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 29310599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Outcomes of Cannabis Use During Pregnancy Within the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry 2007-2020: Opportunities Within Midwifery-Led Care.
Joseph-Lemon L; Thompson H; Verostick L; Shizuka Oura H; Jolles DR
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2022 Jul-Sep 01; 36(3):264-273. PubMed ID: 35894723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Outcomes of pregnancy in women using illegal drugs and in women who smoke cigarettes.
Black M; Bhattacharya S; Fairley T; Campbell DM; Shetty A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jan; 92(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22913319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Does attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic improve clinical outcomes in women with class III obesity compared with standard care? A retrospective case-note analysis.
Denison FC; MacGregor H; Stirrat LI; Stevenson K; Norman JE; Reynolds RM
BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(5):e015218. PubMed ID: 28637644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison of midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in Singapore: A retrospective cohort study.
Voon ST; Lay JTS; San WTW; Shorey S; Lin SKS
Midwifery; 2017 Oct; 53():71-79. PubMed ID: 28778037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluating a Midwife-Led Model of Antenatal Care for Women with a Previous Cesarean Section: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study.
White HK; le May A; Cluett ER
Birth; 2016 Sep; 43(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 26991669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study.
Kearney L; Kynn M; Craswell A; Reed R
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28103820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population.
Pouwels A; Offerhaus P; Merkx A; Zeegers B; Nieuwenhuijze MJ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):366. PubMed ID: 32546154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The effect of maternal age and planned place of birth on intrapartum outcomes in healthy women with straightforward pregnancies: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.
Li Y; Townend J; Rowe R; Knight M; Brocklehurst P; Hollowell J
BMJ Open; 2014 Jan; 4(1):e004026. PubMed ID: 24441052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Narrowing the Gap? Describing women's outcomes in Midwifery Group Practice in remote Australia.
Lack BM; Smith RM; Arundell MJ; Homer CS
Women Birth; 2016 Oct; 29(5):465-470. PubMed ID: 27050200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Monk A; Tracy MB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():339. PubMed ID: 26679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England: 2. Specific aspects of care.
Macfarlane AJ; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Turner LR
Midwifery; 2014 Sep; 30(9):1009-20. PubMed ID: 24929271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians.
Tucker JS; Hall MH; Howie PW; Reid ME; Barbour RS; Florey CD; McIlwaine GM
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7030):554-9. PubMed ID: 8595287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
