These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25820049)

  • 1. NT pro B type natriuretic peptide levels in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Parakh N; Mehrotra S; Seth S; Ramakrishnan S; Kothari SS; Bhargava B; Bahl VK
    Indian Heart J; 2015; 67(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25820049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic utility of plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein levels in differential diagnosis of pericardial constriction and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Karaahmet T; Yilmaz F; Tigen K; Mutlu B; Cevik C; Basaran Y
    Congest Heart Fail; 2009; 15(6):265-70. PubMed ID: 19925504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serum NT pro-BNP: relation to systolic and diastolic function in cardiomyopathies and pericardiopathies.
    Mady C; Fernandes F; Arteaga E; Ramires FJ; Buck Pde C; Salemi VM; Ianni BM; Nastari L; Dias RR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 91(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18660945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natriuretic peptides to differentiate constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Diaz-Arocutipa C; Saucedo-Chinchay J; Imazio M; Argulian E
    Clin Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 45(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 34967020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of brain natriuretic peptide levels in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Leya FS; Arab D; Joyal D; Shioura KM; Lewis BE; Steen LH; Cho L
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(11):1900-2. PubMed ID: 15936624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of BNP in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy in patients with renal insufficiency.
    Reddy PR; Dieter RS; Das P; Steen LH; Lewis BE; Leya FS
    J Card Fail; 2007 Oct; 13(8):668-71. PubMed ID: 17923360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging versus brain natriuretic peptide for differentiation of constrictive pericardial disease from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Sengupta PP; Krishnamoorthy VK; Abhayaratna WP; Korinek J; Belohlavek M; Sundt TM; Chandrasekaran K; Seward JB; Tajik AJ; Khandheria BK
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 102(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 18638602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic concordance of echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance-based tissue tracking for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Amaki M; Savino J; Ain DL; Sanz J; Pedrizzetti G; Kulkarni H; Narula J; Sengupta PP
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 7(5):819-27. PubMed ID: 25107553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy? Echocardiographic tissue Doppler analysis].
    Butz T; Faber L; Piper C; Langer C; Kottmann T; Schmidt HK; Wiemer M; Körfer R; Horstkotte D
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Feb; 133(9):399-405. PubMed ID: 18288626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative atrial volume ratio and late gadolinium enhancement provide additive information to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Cheng H; Zhao S; Jiang S; Lu M; Yan C; Ling J; Zhang Y; Liu Q; Ma N; Yin G; Jerecic R; He Z
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Feb; 13(1):15. PubMed ID: 21349202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. B-type natriuretic peptide level in a patient with constrictive pericarditis.
    Brown T; Hollman J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Dec; 68(6):832-4. PubMed ID: 17086538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a noninvasive marker for restrictive syndromes.
    Mady C; Fernandes F; Ramires FJ; Nastari L; Buck PC; Arteaga E; Ianni BM; Salemi VM
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2008 Aug; 41(8):664-7. PubMed ID: 18797698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Value of left ventricular myocardial strain derived from cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking on differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy].
    Yang ZY; Wang H; He Y; Li L; Chang SS; Cui J; Liu T; Lyu J; Du X; Ma CS; Dong JZ
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 May; 48(5):386-392. PubMed ID: 32450655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Sengupta PP; Krishnamoorthy VK; Abhayaratna WP; Korinek J; Belohlavek M; Sundt TM; Chandrasekaran K; Mookadam F; Seward JB; Tajik AJ; Khandheria BK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jan; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19356402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain natriuretic peptide levels in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Babuin L; Alegria JR; Oh JK; Nishimura RA; Jaffe AS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(7):1489-91. PubMed ID: 16580543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incremental value of combining systolic mitral annular velocity and time difference between mitral inflow and diastolic mitral annular velocity to early diastolic annular velocity for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Choi EY; Ha JW; Kim JM; Ahn JA; Seo HS; Lee JH; Rim SJ; Chung N
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2007 Jun; 20(6):738-43. PubMed ID: 17543745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biventricular mechanics in constrictive pericarditis comparison with restrictive cardiomyopathy and impact of pericardiectomy.
    Kusunose K; Dahiya A; Popović ZB; Motoki H; Alraies MC; Zurick AO; Bolen MA; Kwon DH; Flamm SD; Klein AL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 May; 6(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 23532508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Francone M; Dymarkowski S; Kalantzi M; Rademakers FE; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):944-51. PubMed ID: 16228208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left ventricular strain-curve morphology to distinguish between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
    Yang Z; Wang H; Chang S; Cui J; Zhou L; Lv Q; He Y; Du X; Dong J; Ma C
    ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Dec; 8(6):4863-4872. PubMed ID: 34713619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [NT pro-BNP levels in pericardial diseases and how they are used as complementary evaluation method of diastolic restriction. Initial experience: 25 cases].
    Fernandes F; Almeida IJ; Ramires FJ; Buck PC; Salemi VM; Ianni BM; Rabelo R; Mady C
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2006 Mar; 86(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 16612443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.