These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25820183)

  • 1. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
    Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive performance of the human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) for lipophilic chemicals with high octanol-water partition coefficients.
    Takenouchi O; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2013; 38(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 23824015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Kazutoshi S; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Mar; 27(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23149339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation.
    Natsch A; Ryan CA; Foertsch L; Emter R; Jaworska J; Gerberick F; Kern P
    J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1337-52. PubMed ID: 23576290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of "difficult to test" cosmetic ingredients.
    Bergal M; Puginier M; Gerbeix C; Groux H; Roso A; Cottrez F; Milius A
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104781. PubMed ID: 32001296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
    Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for data variability, a key factor in in vivo/in vitro relationships: application to the skin sensitization potency (in vivo LLNA versus in vitro DPRA) example.
    Dimitrov S; Detroyer A; Piroird C; Gomes C; Eilstein J; Pauloin T; Kuseva C; Ivanova H; Popova I; Karakolev Y; Ringeissen S; Mekenyan O
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 27080242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.
    Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison and validation of an in vitro skin sensitization strategy using a data set of 33 chemical references.
    Clouet E; Kerdine-Römer S; Ferret PJ
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):374-385. PubMed ID: 28539215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Mugita N; Hirota M; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):343-53. PubMed ID: 21767275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates.
    Ohtake T; Maeda Y; Hayashi T; Yamanaka H; Nakai M; Takeyoshi M
    Toxicology; 2018 Jan; 393():9-14. PubMed ID: 29100879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.
    Sakaguchi H; Ryan C; Ovigne JM; Schroeder KR; Ashikaga T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1810-20. PubMed ID: 20510347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
    Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test--human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Sakaguchi H; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Kosaka N; Ito Y; Yoneyama K; Sono S; Itagaki H; Toyoda H; Suzuki H
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 18204907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
    Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Hirota M; Sakaguchi H; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1150-60. PubMed ID: 22796097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
    Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of Spectro-DPRA, KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT to estimation of the skin sensitization potential of cosmetics ingredients.
    Cho SA; Choi M; Park SR; An S; Park JH
    J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):300-312. PubMed ID: 31680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.