These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25820183)

  • 21. A comparative evaluation of in vitro skin sensitisation tests: the human cell-line activation test (h-CLAT) versus the local lymph node assay (LLNA).
    Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Kosaka N; Ishikawa M; Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Nishiyama N; Itagaki H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2010 Aug; 38(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 20822320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
    Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of an artificial neural network model for risk assessment of skin sensitization using human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™ and in silico structure alert parameter.
    Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Kouzuki H
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 38(4):514-526. PubMed ID: 29226339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy.
    Jaworska JS; Natsch A; Ryan C; Strickland J; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2355-83. PubMed ID: 26612363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-throughput screening (HTS)-based spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) to predict human skin sensitization potential.
    Cho SA; An S; Park JH
    Toxicol Lett; 2019 Oct; 314():27-36. PubMed ID: 31295538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (I): the Cosmetics Europe database.
    Hoffmann S; Kleinstreuer N; Alépée N; Allen D; Api AM; Ashikaga T; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Goebel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Parakhia R; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):344-358. PubMed ID: 29474128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay for prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
    Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Akimoto M; Katsuoka Y; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(9):585-600. PubMed ID: 31474740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program.
    Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Schepky A; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Reisinger K; Tailhardat M; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Winkler P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1465-73. PubMed ID: 20624454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions.
    Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Usami R; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1348-60. PubMed ID: 25809859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro human skin test for assessing sensitization potential.
    Ahmed SS; Wang XN; Fielding M; Kerry A; Dickinson I; Munuswamy R; Kimber I; Dickinson AM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 May; 36(5):669-84. PubMed ID: 26251951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of the skin sensitization potential of didecyldimethylammonium chloride and 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal and mixtures of these compounds with the excipient ethylene glycol through the human Cell Line Activation Test and the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay.
    Lee J; Cho A; Gautam R; Kim Y; Shin S; Song E; Kim H; Yang S; Acharya M; Jo J; Maharjan A; Shim I; Kim HM; Kim P; Kim T; Lee J; Kang M; Jeong T; Kim C; Kim H; Heo Y
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2019 Aug; 35(8):507-519. PubMed ID: 31462197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods.
    Urbisch D; Mehling A; Guth K; Ramirez T; Honarvar N; Kolle S; Landsiedel R; Jaworska J; Kern PS; Gerberick F; Natsch A; Emter R; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):337-51. PubMed ID: 25541156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new in vitro method for identifying chemical sensitizers combining peptide binding with ARE/EpRE-mediated gene expression in human skin cells.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 29(3):171-92. PubMed ID: 20491607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.
    Mizumachi H; LeBaron MJ; Settivari RS; Miyazawa M; Marty MS; Sakaguchi H
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):915-927. PubMed ID: 33124094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization to Agrochemical Products.
    Strickland J; Truax J; Corvaro M; Settivari R; Henriquez J; McFadden J; Gulledge T; Johnson V; Gehen S; Germolec D; Allen DG; Kleinstreuer N
    Front Toxicol; 2022; 4():852856. PubMed ID: 35586187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.