These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25820353)

  • 1. Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.
    Jin-Tao Q; Yu T; Mei W; Xu-Dong T; Tian-Jian Z; Guo-Hua S; Lei C; Yue H; Zi-Tian W; Yue Z
    Eur Spine J; 2015 May; 24(5):1058-65. PubMed ID: 25820353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis.
    Hammad A; Wirries A; Ardeshiri A; Nikiforov O; Geiger F
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 14(1):229. PubMed ID: 31331364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?
    Cheng JS; Park P; Le H; Reisner L; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E6. PubMed ID: 23905957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database for Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Guan J; Bisson EF; Dailey AT; Hood RS; Schmidt MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E416-21. PubMed ID: 26536435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
    Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Feng Zhang Z; Qing Li C; Jie Zheng W; Liu J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 22614266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How High Are Radiation-related Risks in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Traditional Open Surgery?: A Meta-analysis and Dose Estimates of Ionizing Radiation.
    Kim CH; Lee CH; Kim KP
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 26889987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Khan NR; Clark AJ; Lee SL; Venable GT; Rossi NB; Foley KT
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Dec; 77(6):847-74; discussion 874. PubMed ID: 26214320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.
    Vazan M; Gempt J; Meyer B; Buchmann N; Ryang YM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Jun; 159(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 28160064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity.
    Park P; Wang MY; Lafage V; Nguyen S; Ziewacz J; Okonkwo DO; Uribe JS; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Haque R; Fessler RG; Kanter AS; Deviren V; La Marca F; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Mundis GM; Mummaneni PV;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 25635632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.