These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Witnesses to research wrongdoing. Sieber JE J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Dec; 7(5):3-14. PubMed ID: 23324198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures. Titus SL Account Res; 2014; 21(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 24073604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Survey of Dutch doctors finds evidence of widespread research misconduct. Sheldon T BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2898. PubMed ID: 22522820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gel slicing and dicing: a recipe for disaster. Nat Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 6(4):275. PubMed ID: 15057234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Xie Y; Wang K; Kong Y Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):41. PubMed ID: 34189653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. If a job is worth doing, it is worth doing twice. Russell JF Nature; 2013 Apr; 496(7443):7. PubMed ID: 23552910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Maggio L; Dong T; Driessen E; Artino A Perspect Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 8(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 30915714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts. Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Jul; 15(3):216-226. PubMed ID: 31865855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics. Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices. Sacco DF; Brown M; Bruton SV Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1321-1337. PubMed ID: 30259269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ethics of research for patients in pain. Waisel DB Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2017 Apr; 30(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 28151827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Researchers frustrated by Italian misconduct probe. Abbott A Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):13-14. PubMed ID: 28470221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO. Dickersin K; Chalmers I J R Soc Med; 2011 Dec; 104(12):532-8. PubMed ID: 22179297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The misuse of statistics: concepts, tools, and a research agenda. Gardenier JS; Resnik DB Account Res; 2002; 9(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 12625352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]