170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25820981)
1. Thinking About Data, Research Methods, and Statistical Analyses: Commentary on Sijtsma's (2014) "Playing with Data".
Waldman ID; Lilienfeld SO
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 25820981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology.
Sijtsma K; Veldkamp CL; Wicherts JM
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25820978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison.
Rabelo ALA; Farias JEM; Sarmet MM; Joaquim TCR; Hoersting RC; Victorino L; Modesto JGN; Pilati R
Int J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 55(4):674-683. PubMed ID: 31745980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right.
Sijtsma K
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 25820980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability.
Ulrich R; Miller J
Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
Kunert R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual, institutional, and scientific environment factors associated with questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in scientific health services research publications.
Gerrits RG; Mulyanto J; Wammes JD; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Sep; 20(1):828. PubMed ID: 32883306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.
Gerrits RG; Jansen T; Mulyanto J; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027903. PubMed ID: 31097488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.
Ellis RJ
eNeuro; 2022; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 35922130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts.
Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Jul; 15(3):216-226. PubMed ID: 31865855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists.
Agnoli F; Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Albiero P; Cubelli R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172792. PubMed ID: 28296929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?
Motyl M; Demos AP; Carsel TS; Hanson BE; Melton ZJ; Mueller AB; Prims JP; Sun J; Washburn AN; Wong KM; Yantis C; Skitka LJ
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 28447837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices.
Bruton SV; Medlin M; Brown M; Sacco DF
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1531-1547. PubMed ID: 31981051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Questionable research practices and cumulative science: The consequences of selective reporting on effect size bias and heterogeneity.
Anderson SF; Liu X
Psychol Methods; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36951733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns.
Neoh MJY; Carollo A; Lee A; Esposito G
R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Oct; 10(10):230677. PubMed ID: 37859842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward.
Keener SK; Kepes S; Torka AK
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Sep; 239():104005. PubMed ID: 37625919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
