440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25821144)
1. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review.
Pfeil AM; Allcott K; Pettengell R; von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Szabo Z
Support Care Cancer; 2015 Feb; 23(2):525-45. PubMed ID: 25284721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer.
Aapro MS; Chaplin S; Cornes P; Howe S; Link H; Koptelova N; Mehl A; Di Palma M; Schroader BK; Terkola R
Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep; 31(10):581. PubMed ID: 37728795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in elderly patients with aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL): results of the randomized, open-label, non-inferiority AVOID neutropenia study.
Link H; Illerhaus G; Martens UM; Salar A; Depenbusch R; Köhler A; Engelhardt M; Mahlmann S; Zaiss M; Lammerich A; Bias P; Buchner A
Support Care Cancer; 2021 May; 29(5):2519-2527. PubMed ID: 32944800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in the use of primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors and neutropenia-related hospitalization in elderly cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in the USA: 1995-2015.
Li S; Liu J; Guo H; Gawade PL; Kim C; Bensink ME; Chandler D
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Jun; 28(6):2637-2649. PubMed ID: 31624920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim on survival outcomes of patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Lyman GH; Reiner M; Morrow PK; Crawford J
Ann Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1452-8. PubMed ID: 25851633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study.
Gladkov OA; Buchner A; Bias P; Müller U; Elsässer R
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):395-400. PubMed ID: 26092233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.
Almenar D; Mayans J; Juan O; Bueno JM; Lopez JI; Frau A; Guinot M; Cerezuela P; Buscalla EG; Gasquet JA; Sanchez J
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 May; 18(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19076208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
