These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25821376)
21. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty]. Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Aesthetic Comparison between Subcuticular Suture and Staple Closure of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Incision Scars: A Prospective Controlled Single-blinded Trial. Rajamand S; Kakos D; Tong D; Garmo L; Soo TM Cureus; 2019 Feb; 11(2):e3996. PubMed ID: 30989005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients. Bron T; Zakine G Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is the Risk of Infection Lower with Sutures than with Staples for Skin Closure After Orthopaedic Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Krishnan RJ; Crawford EJ; Syed I; Kim P; Rampersaud YR; Martin J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):922-937. PubMed ID: 30958392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Gatt D; Quick CR; Owen-Smith MS Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):318-20. PubMed ID: 3901864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing sutures versus staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Krishnan R; MacNeil SD; Malvankar-Mehta MS BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e009257. PubMed ID: 26792213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Orthopedic Skin Closure in South India: Sutures Versus Staples and Their Postoperative Outcomes. Nagasamy S; Elangovan P; Pandian H; Tajudeen S; Ganesh A Cureus; 2024 Sep; 16(9):e69436. PubMed ID: 39411607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M; Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Scientific basis for the selection of skin closure techniques. Edlich RF; Gubler K; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Long WB J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 21284598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sutures versus staples in skin flap operations. Coupland RM Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1986 Jan; 68(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 3947010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods. Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Foot and Ankle Surgical Incision Closure With Three Different Materials. Yao D; Nachtsheim J; Ettinger S; Altemeier A; Claassen L; Plaass C; Schwarze M; Daniilidis K; Brüggenjürgen B; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Lerch M J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(4):760-765. PubMed ID: 35370050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure? Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use. Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section. Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Natural fiber reinforced biodegradable staples: Novel approach for efficient wound closure. Lalhmangaihzuali PC; Latha BD; More N; Choppadandi M; Kapusetti G Med Hypotheses; 2019 May; 126():60-65. PubMed ID: 31010501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Comparative Study Between Conventional Sutures, Staples, and Adhesive Glue for Clean Elective Surgical Skin Closure. Mastud K; Lamture Y; Nagtode T; Rewale V Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31196. PubMed ID: 36505125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure. Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]