These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25821676)

  • 1. Dynamic force microscopy simulator (dForce): A tool for planning and understanding tapping and bimodal AFM experiments.
    Guzman HV; Garcia PD; Garcia R
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():369-79. PubMed ID: 25821676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insights and guidelines to interpret forces and deformations at the nanoscale by using a tapping mode AFM simulator: dForce 2.0.
    Gisbert VG; Garcia R
    Soft Matter; 2023 Aug; 19(31):5857-5868. PubMed ID: 37305960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of dynamic cantilever behavior in tapping mode atomic force microscopy.
    Deng W; Zhang GM; Murphy MF; Lilley F; Harvey DM; Burton DR
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):935-46. PubMed ID: 26303510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scaling law to determine peak forces in tapping-mode AFM experiments on finite elastic soft matter systems.
    Guzman HV
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2017; 8():968-974. PubMed ID: 28546891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analyzing the Effect of Capillary Force on Vibrational Performance of the Cantilever of an Atomic Force Microscope in Tapping Mode with Double Piezoelectric Layers in an Air Environment.
    Nahavandi A; Korayem MH
    Microsc Microanal; 2015 Oct; 21(5):1195-206. PubMed ID: 26324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gaining insight into the physics of dynamic atomic force microscopy in complex environments using the VEDA simulator.
    Kiracofe D; Melcher J; Raman A
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Jan; 83(1):013702. PubMed ID: 22299957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing viscoelastic surfaces with bimodal tapping-mode atomic force microscopy: Underlying physics and observables for a standard linear solid model.
    Solares SD
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2014; 5():1649-63. PubMed ID: 25383277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular dynamics simulation of bimodal atomic force microscopy.
    Dou Z; Qian J; Li Y; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Lin R; Wang T
    Ultramicroscopy; 2020 May; 212():112971. PubMed ID: 32126474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dynamic model of the jump-to phenomenon during AFM analysis.
    Bowen J; Cheneler D
    Langmuir; 2012 Dec; 28(50):17273-86. PubMed ID: 23157559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple and efficient quasi 3-dimensional viscoelastic model and software for simulation of tapping-mode atomic force microscopy.
    Solares SD
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():2233-41. PubMed ID: 26734515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite-element vibration analysis of tapping-mode atomic force microscopy in liquid.
    Song Y; Bhushan B
    Ultramicroscopy; 2007 Oct; 107(10-11):1095-104. PubMed ID: 17566661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination of adhesion and viscoelasticity from nanoscale maps of polymer surfaces using bimodal atomic force microscopy.
    Rajabifar B; Bajaj A; Reifenberger R; Proksch R; Raman A
    Nanoscale; 2021 Oct; 13(41):17428-17441. PubMed ID: 34647552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cantilever energy effects on bimodal AFM: phase and amplitude contrast of multicomponent samples.
    Chakraborty I; Yablon DG
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Nov; 24(47):475706. PubMed ID: 24177059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple regimes of operation in bimodal AFM: understanding the energy of cantilever eigenmodes.
    Kiracofe D; Raman A; Yablon D
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2013; 4():385-93. PubMed ID: 23844344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Material property analytical relations for the case of an AFM probe tapping a viscoelastic surface containing multiple characteristic times.
    López-Guerra EA; Solares SD
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2017; 8():2230-2244. PubMed ID: 29114450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of drive frequency and set point amplitude on tapping forces in atomic force microscopy: simulation and experiment.
    Legleiter J
    Nanotechnology; 2009 Jun; 20(24):245703. PubMed ID: 19471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simulation of atomic force microscope microcantilever in the tapping mode utilizing couple stress theory.
    Abbasi M
    Micron; 2018 Apr; 107():20-27. PubMed ID: 29414132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of the excitation frequency for high probe sensitivity in single-eigenmode and bimodal tapping-mode AFM.
    Eslami B; López-Guerra EA; Diaz AJ; Solares SD
    Nanotechnology; 2015 Apr; 26(16):165703. PubMed ID: 25825001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast automated processing of AFM PeakForce curves to evaluate spatially resolved Young modulus and stiffness of turgescent cells.
    Offroy M; Razafitianamaharavo A; Beaussart A; Pagnout C; Duval JFL
    RSC Adv; 2020 May; 10(33):19258-19275. PubMed ID: 35515432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydrodynamic effects of the tip movement on surface nanobubbles: a combined tapping mode, lift mode and force volume mode AFM study.
    Walczyk W; Hain N; Schönherr H
    Soft Matter; 2014 Aug; 10(32):5945-54. PubMed ID: 24988375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.