BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25822015)

  • 1. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
    Dave T; Fukuma Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
    Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing School-Aged Refraction Measurements Using the 2WIN-S Portable Refractor in Relation to Cycloplegic Retinoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Liu Z; Pazo EE; Ye H; Yu C; Xu L; He W
    J Ophthalmol; 2021; 2021():6612476. PubMed ID: 34094595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of the 2WIN Photoscreener With "CR" Strabismus Estimation in High-Risk Patients.
    Arnold SL; Arnold AW; Sprano JH; Arnold RW
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():195-203. PubMed ID: 31077668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction.
    Perches S; Collados MV; Ares J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1243-53. PubMed ID: 27391538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.
    Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Refraction Defects in Childhood Measured Using Plusoptix S09, 2WIN Photorefractometer, Benchtop Autorefractometer, and Cycloplegic Retinoscopy.
    Yalcın E; Sultan P; Yılmaz S; Pallikaris IG
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 27142192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients.
    Ruiss M; Findl O; Draschl P; Harrer-Seely A; Hirnschall N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 34292891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 2Win and plusoptiX A12R refractometers with Retinomax handheld autorefractor keratometer.
    Racano E; Alessi S; Pertile R
    J AAPOS; 2019 Oct; 23(5):276.e1-276.e5. PubMed ID: 31539614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central and peripheral autorefraction repeatability in normal eyes.
    Moore KE; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1106-12. PubMed ID: 25062133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.
    Satou T; Takahashi Y; Niida T
    Strabismus; 2020 Dec; 28(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 33063575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.