These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25822327)
1. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-minimization analysis of biweekly dosing of cetuximab and FOLFIRI compared with panitumumab and FOLFOX for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the United States. Gathirua-Mwangi WG; Sethi H; Afable MG; Bhattacharyya D; Khan T J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 34529522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy. Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England. Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial. Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Peeters M; Price TJ; Cervantes A; Sobrero AF; Ducreux M; Hotko Y; André T; Chan E; Lordick F; Punt CJ; Strickland AH; Wilson G; Ciuleanu TE; Roman L; Van Cutsem E; Tzekova V; Collins S; Oliner KS; Rong A; Gansert J J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4706-13. PubMed ID: 20921462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US. Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Biomarker Analyses of Once-Every-2-Weeks Cetuximab Plus First-Line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in Patients With KRAS or All RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Phase 2 APEC Study. Cheng AL; Cornelio G; Shen L; Price T; Yang TS; Chung IJ; Dai GH; Lin JK; Sharma A; Yeh KH; Ma B; Zaatar A; Guan Z; Masood N; Srimuninnimit V; Yau T; Gibbs P; Wang X; Doval DC; Oh ST; Shim BY; Gorospe C; Wang HM; Sirachainan E; Hill A; Suh KW; Beier F; Chatterjee S; Lim R Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Jun; 16(2):e73-e88. PubMed ID: 27780749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting. Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Describe the Use of Panitumumab in Combination with Chemotherapy in Real-World Clinical Practice for Patients with Wild-Type RAS mCRC. Hebart H; Kiehl M; Tomasek J; Csoszi T; Koukakis R; Kafatos G; Kuhn A; Bjorklof K; Demonty G; Buchler T Adv Ther; 2019 Mar; 36(3):670-683. PubMed ID: 30689133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale Multicenter phase II study. Colucci G; Giuliani F; Garufi C; Mattioli R; Manzione L; Russo A; Lopez M; Parrella P; Tommasi S; Copetti M; Daniele B; Pisconti S; Tuveri G; Silvestris N; Maiello E Oncology; 2010; 79(5-6):415-22. PubMed ID: 21474966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status. Mitchell EP; Piperdi B; Lacouture ME; Shearer H; Iannotti N; Pillai MV; Xu F; Yassine M Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2011 Dec; 10(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22000810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SPIRITT: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Panitumumab with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab with FOLFIRI as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Unresectable Wild Type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Hecht JR; Cohn A; Dakhil S; Saleh M; Piperdi B; Cline-Burkhardt M; Tian Y; Go WY Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2015 Jun; 14(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 25982297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]