These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ. Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study. Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz U Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8598253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges. Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations. Banomyong D; Messer H J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]