These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25822920)

  • 21. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Viewers prefer predictive cues.
    Kuratomi K; Yoshizaki K
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Aug; 44():179-185. PubMed ID: 27512910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control.
    Vietze I; Wendt M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1391-400. PubMed ID: 19048452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 21299334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.
    Kleinsorge T
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 21617987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do the hemispheres differ in their preparation for global/local processing?
    Volberg G; Hübner R
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 17146646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cue- versus response-locked processes in backward inhibition: evidence from ERPs.
    Sinai M; Goffaux P; Phillips NA
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):596-609. PubMed ID: 17451492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings.
    Schneider DW; Verbruggen F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1629-40. PubMed ID: 18609408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1124-40. PubMed ID: 11009248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
    Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: effects of target duration and intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 23709067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: the role of mediator retrieval.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):347-63. PubMed ID: 16569151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Context modulation of learned attention deployment.
    Uengoer M; Pearce JM; Lachnit H; Koenig S
    Learn Behav; 2018 Mar; 46(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 28597217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.
    Bugg JM; Smallwood A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.