These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25823203)

  • 1. Plaintiffs avoid legal standing issue in King case.
    Schencker L
    Mod Healthc; 2015 Feb; 45(8):11. PubMed ID: 25823203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. King v. Burwell--ACA Armageddon Averted.
    Hall MA
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):497-9. PubMed ID: 26132865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the fallout from King v. Burwell--exchanges and the ACA.
    Bagley N; Jones DK; Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Jan; 372(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 25493976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Access to health care for millions in the balance as US Supreme Court reviews federal subsidies for insurance.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):454. PubMed ID: 25647191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Challenges to the Affordable Care Act After King v Burwell.
    Hermer LD
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2016 May; 91(5):554-7. PubMed ID: 27061766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. King v Burwell: Subsidizing US Health Insurance for Low- and Middle-Income Individuals.
    Gostin LO; DeBartolo MC; Hougendobler DA
    JAMA; 2015 Jul; 314(4):333-4. PubMed ID: 26158803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subsidies and the survival of the ACA--divided decisions on premium tax credits.
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Sep; 371(10):890-1. PubMed ID: 25075618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Once more into the breach: the future of subsidies in the federal health insurance exchange.
    Rosenbaum S
    Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 25492596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. King v. Burwell: US Supreme Court extends tax credits for health insurance coverage to all 50 states.
    Klusty T; Bi S
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Oct; 17(10):938-44. PubMed ID: 26496057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restructuring Medicaid as block grants--unconstitutional coercion?
    Rosenbaum S; Westmoreland T
    N Engl J Med; 2015 May; 372(19):1785-7. PubMed ID: 25902383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health Reform Redux: Where Might a Republican Congress Be Heading?
    Rosenbaum S
    Milbank Q; 2015 Jun; 93(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 26044623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the courts to sow confusion.
    Goozner M
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(30):24. PubMed ID: 25181807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. King v. Burwell: Desperately Seeking Ambiguity in Clear Statutory Text.
    Adler JH; Cannon MF
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2015 Jun; 40(3):577-88. PubMed ID: 25425084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ruling could yield chaos.
    Nuzback K
    Tex Med; 2014 Oct; 110(10):39-42. PubMed ID: 25329339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. King v. Burwell: My Predictions and Some Observations on William Howard Taft.
    Graham N
    Todays FDA; 2015; 27(5):6-7, 9. PubMed ID: 26460428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obamacare supporters nervous about legal test of subsidies.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Mar; 44(13):10. PubMed ID: 24934017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Searching for clues on how the Supreme Court would rule on subsidies.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(30):9-10. PubMed ID: 25181804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three Words and the Future of the Affordable Care Act.
    Bagley N
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2015 Jun; 40(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 25425083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Of SCOTUS and chicken.
    Levitt L
    JAMA; 2015 May; 313(18):1785-6. PubMed ID: 25965203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court watch: redistricting commissions and federal health care exchanges are the focus of two important cases now in the hands of Supreme Court justices.
    Soronen L
    State Legis; 2015 Apr; 41(4):19. PubMed ID: 25946755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.