BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25823477)

  • 21. Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.
    Harvey RS; Kovatch KJ; Prince MEP; Malloy KM; Thorne MC
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Mar; 129(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 30247746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2021 Otolaryngology Residency Match: Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.
    Lenze NR; Mihalic AP; Kovatch KJ; Thorne MC; Kupfer RA
    Laryngoscope; 2022 Jun; 132(6):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 34515992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How should unmatched orthopaedic surgery applicants proceed?
    Amin NH; Jakoi AM; Cerynik DL; Kumar NS; Johanson N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Feb; 471(2):672-9. PubMed ID: 22826011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
    Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of residency performance: a follow-up study.
    Calhoun KH; Hokanson JA; Bailey BJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Jun; 116(6 Pt 1):647-51. PubMed ID: 9215377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do otolaryngology residency applicants relocate for training?
    Gebhard GM; Hauser LJ; Dally MJ; Weitzenkamp DA; Cabrera-Muffly C
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Apr; 126(4):829-33. PubMed ID: 26228114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applicant-to-Residency Program Communication: Does It Matter?
    Solis RN; Quesada PR; Ma C; Olinde LM; Diaz RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Nov; 129(11):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 32483992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience.
    Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S
    Acad Med; 2022 May; 97(5):664-668. PubMed ID: 34618735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increasing Competitiveness for an Otolaryngology Residency: Where We Are and Concerns about the Future.
    Kaplan AB; Riedy KN; Grundfast KM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):699-701. PubMed ID: 26187905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standardized letters of recommendation and successful match into otolaryngology.
    Kimple AJ; McClurg SW; Del Signore AG; Tomoum MO; Lin FC; Senior BA
    Laryngoscope; 2016 May; 126(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 26839977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attitudes of Residents and Program Directors Towards Research in Otolaryngology Residency.
    Mansi A; Karam WN; Chaaban MR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Jan; 128(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 30371115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Still under the microscope: can a surgical aptitude test predict otolaryngology resident performance?
    Moore EJ; Price DL; Van Abel KM; Carlson ML
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Feb; 125(2):E57-61. PubMed ID: 24945869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
    Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Competitiveness of Otolaryngology Residency Applicants without a Home Program.
    Wang JC; Pillutla P; Tello N; Gabrilska R; Aranke M; Bibb T; Watkins PD; Cordero J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 May; 129(5):462-468. PubMed ID: 31845588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. National assessment of business-of-medicine training and its implications for the development of a business-of-medicine curriculum.
    Patel AT; Bohmer RM; Barbour JR; Fried MP
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15630366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency.
    Campagna-Vaillancourt M; Manoukian J; Razack S; Nguyen LH
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jan; 124(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 24122744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.
    Thurman RJ; Katz E; Carter W; Han J; Kayala E; McCoin N; Storrow AB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19388912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Otolaryngology Applicant Perspectives on In-person and Virtual Residency Interviews.
    Barrera S; Agarwal A; Cabrera-Muffly C; Groves M; Cottrill E; Allen A; Koehn H; Megow L; Cognetti D; Stringer S; Kane AC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Apr; 170(4):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 38279960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Evaluation of the Program-Specific Paragraph in the Otolaryngology Residency Application.
    Stepan KO; Kaul VF; Raquib AR; Kozin ED; Sethi RK; Malkin BD; Gray ST; Teng MS
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Nov; 128(11):2508-2513. PubMed ID: 30247748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
    Go PH; Klaassen Z; Chamberlain RS
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 22515757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.