BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25823484)

  • 1. Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate.
    Cantekin K
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 25823484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®).
    Cantekin K; Avci S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 25141202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.
    Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Motahari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22269237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of adhesive materials on shear bond strength of a mineral trioxide aggregate.
    Ali A; Banerjee A; Mannocci F
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 27093776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials.
    Cengiz E; Ulusoy N
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 27045140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cement to Different Root Perforation Materials.
    Lemos Martins Sicuro S; Gabardo MC; Castiglia Gonzaga C; Dias Morais N; Baratto-Filho F; Correr Nolasco GM; Leonardi DP
    J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1819-1821. PubMed ID: 27769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin.
    Shin JH; Jang JH; Park SH; Kim E
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1210-6. PubMed ID: 25069935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals.
    Atabek D; Sillelioğlu H; Olmez A
    J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1288-92. PubMed ID: 22892753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bound to mineral trioxide aggregate.
    Yesilyurt C; Yildirim T; Taşdemir T; Kusgoz A
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1381-3. PubMed ID: 19801234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents.
    Zarean P; Roozbeh R; Zarean P; Jahromi MZ; Broujeni PM
    Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 31577067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine.
    Altunsoy M; Tanrıver M; Ok E; Kucukyilmaz E
    J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1691-5. PubMed ID: 26238526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel experimental cements for use on the dentin-pulp complex.
    Dantas RV; Conde MC; Sarmento HR; Zanchi CH; Tarquinio SB; Ogliari FA; Demarco FF
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 23207847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timing for composite resin placement on mineral trioxide aggregate.
    Tsujimoto M; Tsujimoto Y; Ookubo A; Shiraishi T; Watanabe I; Yamada S; Hayashi Y
    J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1167-70. PubMed ID: 23953292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement with ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus.
    Tyagi N; Chaman C; Anand S; Dhull A; Prakash R; Tomar H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 38514429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems.
    Alzraikat H; Taha NA; Qasrawi D; Burrow MF
    Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):881-887. PubMed ID: 27680033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the mineral trioxide aggregate-resin modified glass ionomer cement interface in different setting conditions.
    Eid AA; Komabayashi T; Watanabe E; Shiraishi T; Watanabe I
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22794220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The shear bond strength of resin-based composite to white mineral trioxide aggregate.
    Neelakantan P; Grotra D; Subbarao CV; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Aug; 143(8):e40-5. PubMed ID: 22855910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed with Water and Water-based Gel Regarding Shear Bond Strength with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite.
    Kaul R; Choudhary A; Kour S; Singh A; Kumari N; Manish K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 34267002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of shear bond strength of light cure mineral trioxide aggregate and light cure calcium hydroxide with nanofilled composite: A stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscope analysis.
    Boby A; Pai D; Ginjupalli K; Gaur S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32174630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.