These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25823596)

  • 1. True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention.
    Atkinson G; Batterham AM
    Exp Physiol; 2015 Jun; 100(6):577-88. PubMed ID: 25823596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-Individual Responses of Maximal Oxygen Uptake to Exercise Training: A Critical Review.
    Williamson PJ; Atkinson G; Batterham AM
    Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 47(8):1501-1513. PubMed ID: 28097487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Issues in the determination of 'responders' and 'non-responders' in physiological research.
    Atkinson G; Williamson P; Batterham AM
    Exp Physiol; 2019 Aug; 104(8):1215-1225. PubMed ID: 31116468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Method to Stop Analyzing Random Error and Start Analyzing Differential Responders to Exercise.
    Dankel SJ; Loenneke JP
    Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 50(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 31254258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Liu P; Ioannidis JPA; Ross JS; Dhruva SS; Luxkaranayagam AT; Vasiliou V; Wallach JD
    BMC Med; 2019 Oct; 17(1):188. PubMed ID: 31639007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE].
    Ernest P; Jandrain B; Scheen AJ
    Rev Med Liege; 2015; 70(5-6):232-6. PubMed ID: 26285444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability in exercise physiology: Can capturing
    Chrzanowski-Smith OJ; Piatrikova E; Betts JA; Williams S; Gonzalez JT
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 May; 20(4):452-460. PubMed ID: 31397212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
    Colditz GA
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-individual differences in weight change following exercise interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Williamson PJ; Atkinson G; Batterham AM
    Obes Rev; 2018 Jul; 19(7):960-975. PubMed ID: 29701297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction: Personalized medicine: what is it and what are the challenges?
    Sigman M
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Jun; 109(6):944-945. PubMed ID: 29935651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeated testing for the assessment of individual response to exercise training.
    Hecksteden A; Pitsch W; Rosenberger F; Meyer T
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 Jun; 124(6):1567-1579. PubMed ID: 29357481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An appraisal of the SD
    Bonafiglia JT; Brennan AM; Ross R; Gurd BJ
    Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(14):e14163. PubMed ID: 31325240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishing efficacy of a new experimental treatment in the 'gold standard' design.
    Hauschke D; Pigeot I
    Biom J; 2005 Dec; 47(6):782-6; discussion 787-98. PubMed ID: 16450851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
    Anglemyer A; Horvath HT; Bero L
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):MR000034. PubMed ID: 24782322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On statistical methods to test if sampling in trials is genuinely random.
    Pandit JJ
    Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):456-462. PubMed ID: 22404285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.