These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25823764)

  • 41. Executive control in obsessive-compulsive disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.
    Ruchsow M; Reuter K; Hermle L; Ebert D; Kiefer M; Falkenstein M
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2007; 114(12):1595-601. PubMed ID: 17610122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study.
    Smith JL; Jamadar S; Provost AL; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 22885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sedentary time is related to deficits in response inhibition among adults with overweight and obesity: An accelerometry and event-related brain potentials study.
    Pindus DM; Edwards CG; Walk AM; Reeser G; Burd NA; Holscher HD; Khan NA
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13843. PubMed ID: 34021599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. II. Developmental change of response inhibition].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18210860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 response.
    Maguire MJ; Brier MR; Moore PS; Ferree TC; Ray D; Mostofsky S; Hart J; Kraut MA
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 19773108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Frontal theta and alpha power and coherence changes are modulated by semantic complexity in Go/NoGo tasks.
    Brier MR; Ferree TC; Maguire MJ; Moore P; Spence J; Tillman GD; Hart J; Kraut MA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Dec; 78(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 20696190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does executive control really play a crucial role in explaining age-related cognitive and neural differences?
    Cona G; Arcara G; Amodio P; Schiff S; Bisiacchi PS
    Neuropsychology; 2013 May; 27(3):378-89. PubMed ID: 23688219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Hinojosa JA; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():272-81. PubMed ID: 23523776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neurophysiological indices of the transfer of cognitive training gains to untrained tasks.
    Wang X; Covey TJ
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 May; 171():107205. PubMed ID: 32145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 23182873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2224-32. PubMed ID: 11738192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Age-related effects on perceptual and semantic encoding in memory.
    Kuo MC; Liu KP; Ting KH; Chan CC
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar; 261():95-106. PubMed ID: 24374080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Event-related neural oscillation changes following reasoning training in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.
    Mudar RA; Nguyen LT; Eroh J; Chiang HS; Rackley A; Chapman SB
    Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 1704():229-240. PubMed ID: 30342001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA; van Staveren AS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1660-71. PubMed ID: 11514249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.