532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25825096)
1. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu IF; Antonson SA; Campillo-Funollet M; Antonson D; Munoz-Viveros C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study.
Chandra PV; Harikumar V; Ramkiran D; Krishna MJ; Gouda MV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study.
Reddy SN; Jayashankar DN; Nainan M; Shivanna V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23579894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
Sadeghi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.
Shafiei L; Mojiri P; Ghahraman Y; Rakhshan V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.
Heintze SD; Monreal D; Peschke A
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
