532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25825096)
21. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of Cavity Margin Design and Restorative Material on Marginal Quality and Seal of Extended Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
Soliman S; Preidl R; Karl S; Hofmann N; Krastl G; Klaiber B
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 26814320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sealing effectiveness of etch-and-rinse vs self-etching adhesives after water aging: influence of acid etching and NaOCl dentin pretreatment.
Monticelli F; Toledano M; Silva AS; Osorio E; Osorio R
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Jun; 10(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18652266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of operator-specific handling on tooth-composite interface and microleakage formation.
Schneider H; Busch I; Busch M; Jentsch H; Häfer M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 19363976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
Cenci MS; Lund RG; Pereira CL; de Carvalho RM; Demarco FF
J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
