532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25825096)
41. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study.
Agrawal VS; Parekh VV; Shah NC
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-7. PubMed ID: 22616928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of caries infiltrant contamination on shear bond strength of different adhesives to dentin.
Jia L; Stawarczyk B; Schmidlin PR; Attin T; Wiegand A
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):643-8. PubMed ID: 22526893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Gingival seal of deep Class II direct and indirect composite restorations.
Kenyon BJ; Frederickson D; Hagge MS
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17380801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sealing of minimally invasive Class II fillings (slot) using an adhesive patch: sealant margin extension for prevention.
Schmidlin PR; Seemann R; Filli T; Attin T; Imfeld T
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 17910225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of different surface pre-treatment methods on the microleakage of two different self-adhesive composites in Class V cavities.
Celik EU; Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25793951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Resin composites: Modulus of elasticity and marginal quality.
Benetti AR; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A; Flury S
J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25019363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations.
Silva Santana SV; Bombana AC; Flório FM; Basting RT
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 20002927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents.
Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive.
Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 17432395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
