These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25825980)
1. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast. Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions. Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model observer performance in contrast-enhanced lesions in breast CT: The influence of contrast concentration on detectability. Lyu SH; Hernandez AM; Shakeri SA; Abbey CK; Boone JM Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6748-6761. PubMed ID: 37639329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre-whitened matched filter and convolutional neural network based model observer performance for mass lesion detection in non-contrast breast CT. Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7558-7567. PubMed ID: 37646463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms. Yu L; Leng S; Chen L; Kofler JM; Carter RE; McCollough CH Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041908. PubMed ID: 23556902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance metrics of 3D stereoscopic digital mammography compared with 2D digital mammography: observer study. Daidoji A; Aoki T; Murakami S; Miyata M; Fujii M; Katsuki T; Inoue Y; Tashima Y; Nagata Y; Hirata K; Tanaka F; Korogi Y Br J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 91(1086):20170908. PubMed ID: 29319344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens. Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Timberg P; Båth M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5618-26. PubMed ID: 21158273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dedicated breast computed tomography: volume image denoising via a partial-diffusion equation based technique. Xia JQ; Lo JY; Yang K; Floyd CE; Boone JM Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1950-8. PubMed ID: 18561671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images. Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality. Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT. Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection. Webb LJ; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA; Ghate SV; Kim C; Soo MS; Walsh R Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1972-80. PubMed ID: 21626930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images. Kumazawa S; Muramatsu C; Li Q; Li F; Shiraishi J; Caligiuri P; Schmidt RA; MacMahon H; Doi K Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94. PubMed ID: 18572125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers. Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):933-945. PubMed ID: 38154070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subjective similarity of patterns of diffuse interstitial lung disease on thin-section CT: an observer performance study. Li F; Kumazawa S; Shiraishi J; Li Q; Engelmann R; Caligiuri P; MacMahon H; Doi K Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):477-85. PubMed ID: 19268860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Summation or axial slab average intensity projection of abdominal thin-section CT datasets: can they substitute for the primary reconstruction from raw projection data? Lee KH; Hong H; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim YH J Digit Imaging; 2008 Dec; 21(4):422-32. PubMed ID: 17805929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography. Svane G; Azavedo E; Lindman K; Urech M; Nilsson J; Weber N; Lindqvist L; Ullberg C Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 21498340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]