These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25825980)

  • 21. A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT.
    Gong H; Yu L; Leng S; Dilger SK; Ren L; Zhou W; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2052-2063. PubMed ID: 30889282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Human and model observer performance for lesion detection in breast cone beam CT images with the FDK reconstruction.
    Han M; Kim B; Baek J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194408. PubMed ID: 29543868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT.
    Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: I. Correlation of human observer performance between anatomical and uniform backgrounds.
    Dilger SKN; Yu L; Chen B; Favazza CP; Carter RE; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Leng S
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105011. PubMed ID: 30995611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images.
    Petrick N; Kim HJ; Clunie D; Borradaile K; Ford R; Zeng R; Gavrielides MA; McNitt-Gray MF; Lu ZQ; Fenimore C; Zhao B; Buckler AJ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24331262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.
    Gazi PM; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Yang K; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6322-46. PubMed ID: 27494376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
    Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coronal multiplanar reconstruction view from whole lung thin-section CT by multidetector-row CT: determination of malignant or benign lesions and differential diagnosis in 68 cases of solitary pulmonary nodule.
    Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Honda O; Koyama M; Murai S; Inoue A; Sumikawa H; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Yamamoto S; Nakamura H; Kudo M
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):267-71. PubMed ID: 14743900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. VALIDATION OF A SIMULATION PROCEDURE FOR GENERATING BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS PROJECTION IMAGES.
    Petersson H; Warren LM; Tingberg A; Dustler M; Timberg P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 26842713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of slice thickness on liver lesion detection and characterisation by multidetector CT.
    Smith JT; Hawkins RM; Guthrie JA; Wilson DJ; Arnold PM; Boyes S; Robinson PJ
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Jun; 54(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 20598005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.
    Metheany KG; Abbey CK; Packard N; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4685-94. PubMed ID: 18975714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.
    Leng S; Yu L; Zhang Y; Carter R; Toledano AY; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081908. PubMed ID: 23927322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of iterative model, hybrid iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in low-dose brain CT: impact of thin-slice imaging.
    Nakaura T; Iyama Y; Kidoh M; Yokoyama K; Oda S; Tokuyasu S; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Mar; 58(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 26715558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation.
    Weg N; Scheer MR; Gabor MP
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 9807568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of human observer performance on lesion detectability in single-slice and multislice dedicated breast cone beam CT images with breast anatomical background.
    Han M; Jang H; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5385-5396. PubMed ID: 30273955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study.
    Timberg P; Baath M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2431-7. PubMed ID: 22559613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal subtraction method for lung nodule detection on successive thoracic CT soft-copy images.
    Aoki T; Murakami S; Kim H; Fujii M; Takahashi H; Oki H; Hayashida Y; Katsuragawa S; Shiraishi J; Korogi Y
    Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):255-61. PubMed ID: 24475812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
    Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.