336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25826325)
1. Measuring intraocular pressure after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation with rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Diaz-Valle D; Garcia-Feijoo J
Cornea; 2015 May; 34(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 25826325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):986-992. PubMed ID: 28858044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments.
Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Mendez-Fernandez R; Saenz-Frances F; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27661992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry.
Senthil S; Chary R; Ali MH; Choudhari N; Badakere S; Krishnamurthy R; Dikshit S; Garudadri C
Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1117-1123. PubMed ID: 31206396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study.
Achiron A; Blumenfeld O; Avizemer H; Karmona L; Leybowich G; Man V; Bartov E; Burgansky-Eliash Z
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):822-828. PubMed ID: 27871779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry.
Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Plange N
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):902-7. PubMed ID: 24588266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification.
Kiddee W; Tanjana A
J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):317-324. PubMed ID: 33137014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
