These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2582664)

  • 21. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mechanical bending strength of explanted ex vivo bone cements compared with in vitro samples].
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Maus U; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 18324590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The microscopic anatomy of the bone-cement interface in failed total hip arthroplasties.
    Johanson NA; Bullough PG; Wilson PD; Salvati EA; Ranawat CS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 May; (218):123-35. PubMed ID: 3568472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of surface finish and of vertical ribs on the stability of a cemented femoral stem: an in vitro stair climbing test.
    Jamali AA; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 16446196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Extensometry and primary anchorage of femur implants. Study of the upper metaphyseal intracortical support of the B.P.R cement-less implant].
    Delecrin J; Passuti N; Royer J; Rogez JM; Bainvel JV
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 2801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.
    Bobyn JD; Jacobs JJ; Tanzer M; Urban RM; Aribindi R; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):21-39. PubMed ID: 7634577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement.
    Maloney WJ; Sychterz C; Bragdon C; McGovern T; Jasty M; Engh CA; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):15-26. PubMed ID: 8981879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Initial stability of a collarless wedge-shaped prosthesis in the femoral canal.
    Sharkey PF; Albert TJ; Hume EL; Rothman RH
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 10149562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of surface strain patterns in cementless femoral arthroplasty.
    Boggan RS
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jul; 4(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 10146280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of 16 retrieved proximally cemented femoral stems.
    Jones RE; Willie BM; Hayes H; Bloebaum RD
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 15660065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
    Hua J; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length.
    Wilson LJ; Roe JA; Pearcy MJ; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):934-9. PubMed ID: 22146384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):1047-58. PubMed ID: 1761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length.
    Arno S; Fetto J; Nguyen NQ; Kinariwala N; Takemoto R; Oh C; Walker PS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22503474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.