239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25826798)
1. Large-scale chemical similarity networks for target profiling of compounds identified in cell-based chemical screens.
Lo YC; Senese S; Li CM; Hu Q; Huang Y; Damoiseaux R; Torres JZ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004153. PubMed ID: 25826798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D Chemical Similarity Networks for Structure-Based Target Prediction and Scaffold Hopping.
Lo YC; Senese S; Damoiseaux R; Torres JZ
ACS Chem Biol; 2016 Aug; 11(8):2244-53. PubMed ID: 27285961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HitPick: a web server for hit identification and target prediction of chemical screenings.
Liu X; Vogt I; Haque T; Campillos M
Bioinformatics; 2013 Aug; 29(15):1910-2. PubMed ID: 23716196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity.
Petrone PM; Simms B; Nigsch F; Lounkine E; Kutchukian P; Cornett A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Jenkins JL; Glick M
ACS Chem Biol; 2012 Aug; 7(8):1399-409. PubMed ID: 22594495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemometric analysis of ligand receptor complementarity: identifying Complementary Ligands Based on Receptor Information (CoLiBRI).
Oloff S; Zhang S; Sukumar N; Breneman C; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):844-51. PubMed ID: 16563016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large-Scale Off-Target Identification Using Fast and Accurate Dual Regularized One-Class Collaborative Filtering and Its Application to Drug Repurposing.
Lim H; Poleksic A; Yao Y; Tong H; He D; Zhuang L; Meng P; Xie L
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Oct; 12(10):e1005135. PubMed ID: 27716836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-dimensional computational pipeline for large-scale deep screening of compound effect assessment: an in silico case study on ageing-related compounds.
Gupta V; Crudu A; Matsuoka Y; Ghosh S; Rozot R; Marat X; Jäger S; Kitano H; Breton L
NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2019; 5():42. PubMed ID: 31798962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a benchmarking data set able to evaluate ligand- and structure-based virtual screening using public HTS data.
Lindh M; Svensson F; Schaal W; Zhang J; Sköld C; Brandt P; Karlén A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 25564966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chemogenomics in drug discovery: computational methods based on the comparison of binding sites.
Vulpetti A; Kalliokoski T; Milletti F
Future Med Chem; 2012 Oct; 4(15):1971-9. PubMed ID: 23088277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Historical Bioactivity Data in the Deconvolution of Phenotypic Screens.
Bornot A; Blackett C; Engkvist O; Murray C; Bendtsen C
J Biomol Screen; 2014 Jun; 19(5):696-706. PubMed ID: 24441646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large-scale Direct Targeting for Drug Repositioning and Discovery.
Zheng C; Guo Z; Huang C; Wu Z; Li Y; Chen X; Fu Y; Ru J; Ali Shar P; Wang Y; Wang Y
Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():11970. PubMed ID: 26155766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational Analysis and In silico Predictive Modeling for Inhibitors of PhoP Regulon in S. typhi on High-Throughput Screening Bioassay Dataset.
Kaur H; Ahmad M; Scaria V
Interdiscip Sci; 2016 Mar; 8(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 26298582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioturbo similarity searching: combining chemical and biological similarity to discover structurally diverse bioactive molecules.
Wassermann AM; Lounkine E; Glick M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):692-703. PubMed ID: 23461561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NL MIND-BEST: a web server for ligands and proteins discovery--theoretic-experimental study of proteins of Giardia lamblia and new compounds active against Plasmodium falciparum.
González-Díaz H; Prado-Prado F; Sobarzo-Sánchez E; Haddad M; Maurel Chevalley S; Valentin A; Quetin-Leclercq J; Dea-Ayuela MA; Teresa Gomez-Muños M; Munteanu CR; José Torres-Labandeira J; García-Mera X; Tapia RA; Ubeira FM
J Theor Biol; 2011 May; 276(1):229-49. PubMed ID: 21277861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. G-LoSA: An efficient computational tool for local structure-centric biological studies and drug design.
Lee HS; Im W
Protein Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(4):865-76. PubMed ID: 26813336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new ChEMBL dataset for the similarity-based target fishing engine FastTargetPred: Annotation of an exhaustive list of linear tetrapeptides.
Tanwar S; Auberger P; Gillet G; DiPaola M; Tsaioun K; Villoutreix BO
Data Brief; 2022 Jun; 42():108159. PubMed ID: 35496477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
Wei NN; Hamza A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemogenomic data analysis: prediction of small-molecule targets and the advent of biological fingerprint.
Bender A; Young DW; Jenkins JL; Serrano M; Mikhailov D; Clemons PA; Davies JW
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2007 Sep; 10(8):719-31. PubMed ID: 18045083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
