These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25827156)
1. Quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow: the impact of surface coil-related field inhomogeneity and a comparison of methods for its correction. Miller CA; Hsu LY; Ta A; Conn H; Winkler S; Arai AE J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 25827156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FLASH proton density imaging for improved surface coil intensity correction in quantitative and semi-quantitative SSFP perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Nielles-Vallespin S; Kellman P; Hsu LY; Arai AE J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 25827180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully quantitative pixel-wise analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion improves discrimination of dark rim artifact from perfusion defects associated with epicardial coronary stenosis. Ta AD; Hsu LY; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Shanbhag SM; Chen MY; Patricia Bandettini W; Arai AE J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Mar; 20(1):16. PubMed ID: 29514708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography. Miller CA; Naish JH; Ainslie MP; Tonge C; Tout D; Arumugam P; Banerji A; Egdell RM; Clark D; Weale P; Steadman CD; McCann GP; Ray SG; Parker GJ; Schmitt M J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 24460930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects. Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Comparison of an advanced, high-resolution and a standard sequence. Morton G; Ishida M; Schuster A; Hussain S; Schaeffter T; Chiribiri A; Nagel E J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 22682016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of balanced SSFP myocardial perfusion imaging at 1.5 T: Impact of the reference image. McElroy S; Kunze KP; Milidonis X; Huang L; Nazir MS; Evans C; Bosio F; Mughal N; Masci PG; Neji R; Razavi R; Chiribiri A; Roujol S Magn Reson Med; 2022 Feb; 87(2):702-717. PubMed ID: 34554603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of myocardial blood flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison of distributed parameter and Fermi models with single and dual bolus. Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Kershaw LE; Dweck MR; Alam S; Mirsadraee S; Connell M; Gray C; MacGillivray T; Newby DE; Semple SI J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 25885056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an automated method for arterial input function detection for first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Chang LC; Arai AE; Hsu LY J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Apr; 18():17. PubMed ID: 27055445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT. Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy. Foley JRJ; Kidambi A; Biglands JD; Maredia N; Dickinson CJ; Plein S; Greenwood JP J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Nov; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 29110669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of spatiotemporal fidelity in quantitative 3D first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Wissmann L; Gotschy A; Santelli C; Tezcan KC; Hamada S; Manka R; Kozerke S J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 28125995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]