These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25827156)

  • 1. Quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow: the impact of surface coil-related field inhomogeneity and a comparison of methods for its correction.
    Miller CA; Hsu LY; Ta A; Conn H; Winkler S; Arai AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 25827156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FLASH proton density imaging for improved surface coil intensity correction in quantitative and semi-quantitative SSFP perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Nielles-Vallespin S; Kellman P; Hsu LY; Arai AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 25827180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully quantitative pixel-wise analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion improves discrimination of dark rim artifact from perfusion defects associated with epicardial coronary stenosis.
    Ta AD; Hsu LY; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Shanbhag SM; Chen MY; Patricia Bandettini W; Arai AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Mar; 20(1):16. PubMed ID: 29514708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
    Hsu LY; Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Ta AD; Conn HM; Winkler S; Greve AM; Chen MY; Shanbhag SM; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 29454767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography.
    Miller CA; Naish JH; Ainslie MP; Tonge C; Tout D; Arumugam P; Banerji A; Egdell RM; Clark D; Weale P; Steadman CD; McCann GP; Ray SG; Parker GJ; Schmitt M
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 24460930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Mapping by CMR to Detect Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Validation Against Invasive Coronary Physiology.
    Kotecha T; Martinez-Naharro A; Boldrini M; Knight D; Hawkins P; Kalra S; Patel D; Coghlan G; Moon J; Plein S; Lockie T; Rakhit R; Patel N; Xue H; Kellman P; Fontana M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 12(10):1958-1969. PubMed ID: 30772231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow by contrast-enhanced first-pass CMR perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in dogs and feasibility study in humans.
    Hsu LY; Groves DW; Aletras AH; Kellman P; Arai AE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 5(2):154-66. PubMed ID: 22340821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole.
    Motwani M; Kidambi A; Sourbron S; Fairbairn TA; Uddin A; Kozerke S; Greenwood JP; Plein S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Feb; 16(1):19. PubMed ID: 24565078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully automated pixel-wise quantitative CMR-myocardial perfusion with CMR-coronary angiography to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Zhao SH; Guo WF; Yao ZF; Yang S; Yun H; Chen YY; Han TT; Zhou XY; Fu CX; Zeng MS; Li CG; Pan CZ; Jin H
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7238-7249. PubMed ID: 37145148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary microvascular ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - a pixel-wise quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion study.
    Ismail TF; Hsu LY; Greve AM; Gonçalves C; Jabbour A; Gulati A; Hewins B; Mistry N; Wage R; Roughton M; Ferreira PF; Gatehouse P; Firmin D; O'Hanlon R; Pennell DJ; Prasad SK; Arai AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Aug; 16(1):49. PubMed ID: 25160568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.
    Brown LAE; Onciul SC; Broadbent DA; Johnson K; Fent GJ; Foley JRJ; Garg P; Chew PG; Knott K; Dall'Armellina E; Swoboda PP; Xue H; Greenwood JP; Moon JC; Kellman P; Plein S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 29983119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Comparison of an advanced, high-resolution and a standard sequence.
    Morton G; Ishida M; Schuster A; Hussain S; Schaeffter T; Chiribiri A; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 22682016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of balanced SSFP myocardial perfusion imaging at 1.5 T: Impact of the reference image.
    McElroy S; Kunze KP; Milidonis X; Huang L; Nazir MS; Evans C; Bosio F; Mughal N; Masci PG; Neji R; Razavi R; Chiribiri A; Roujol S
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Feb; 87(2):702-717. PubMed ID: 34554603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of myocardial blood flow by cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison of distributed parameter and Fermi models with single and dual bolus.
    Papanastasiou G; Williams MC; Kershaw LE; Dweck MR; Alam S; Mirsadraee S; Connell M; Gray C; MacGillivray T; Newby DE; Semple SI
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 25885056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of an automated method for arterial input function detection for first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Chang LC; Arai AE; Hsu LY
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Apr; 18():17. PubMed ID: 27055445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
    Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy.
    Foley JRJ; Kidambi A; Biglands JD; Maredia N; Dickinson CJ; Plein S; Greenwood JP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Nov; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 29110669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of spatiotemporal fidelity in quantitative 3D first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Wissmann L; Gotschy A; Santelli C; Tezcan KC; Hamada S; Manka R; Kozerke S
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 28125995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative myocardial perfusion by O-15-water PET: individualized vs. standardized vascular territories.
    Thomassen A; Petersen H; Johansen A; Braad PE; Diederichsen AC; Mickley H; Jensen LO; Gerke O; Simonsen JA; Thayssen P; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 16(9):970-6. PubMed ID: 25944051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification.
    Kellman P; Hansen MS; Nielles-Vallespin S; Nickander J; Themudo R; Ugander M; Xue H
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Apr; 19(1):43. PubMed ID: 28385161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.