These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 258272)

  • 1. Ready for the next birth boom?
    Taylor W
    Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1979 Oct; 15(10):402-6. PubMed ID: 258272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social influences on reproductive performance.
    Baird D
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1973 Dec; 19():585-90. PubMed ID: 4522404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teenage pregnancy trends in England and Wales.
    Dickerson JW
    J R Soc Promot Health; 1999 Sep; 119(3):142. PubMed ID: 10518347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biological and genetic consequences of family planning in Hungary].
    Czeizel E
    Orv Hetil; 1976 Jul; 117(29):1743-9. PubMed ID: 986039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter: Birth rate in Sweden.
    Lagererantz R
    Am J Dis Child; 1975 Jun; 129(6):746. PubMed ID: 1171615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Chilean birth rate. Analysis of its recent modifications].
    Molina R; Medina E; Kaempffer AM; De la Fuente M; Radrigan ME
    Rev Med Chil; 1971 Jul; 99(7):480-5. PubMed ID: 5125927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population review of 1998: England and Wales.
    Williams D
    Popul Trends; 1999; (98):5-10. PubMed ID: 10658240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in multiple births, 1938-1995.
    Wood R
    Popul Trends; 1997; (87):29-35. PubMed ID: 9134573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The health consequences of teenage fertility.
    Makinson C
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 2431924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Some aspects of family planning and population reproduction].
    Fritsche U
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1987 Nov; 33(11):601-3. PubMed ID: 3439240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Birth trends in Germany].
    Höhn C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(11):523-37. PubMed ID: 9480607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast feeding: a motive for family planning.
    Rosa F
    People; 1976; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 1245253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Demographic comments on family planning].
    Arnold H
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1970 Feb; 32(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 4245089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of a representative sample of natural family planning users in England and Wales, 1984-1985.
    von Fragstein M; Flynn A; Royston P
    Int J Fertil; 1988; 33 Suppl():70-7. PubMed ID: 2902033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reproductive health and social guarantees].
    Sanotskiĭ IV
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1999; (3):6-9. PubMed ID: 10222716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population review of England and Wales, 2001.
    Hindess G
    Popul Trends; 2003; (112):7-14. PubMed ID: 12870425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do school-based clinics reduce birthrates?
    Hauser D; Peak G
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(3):136-7; author reply 137-8. PubMed ID: 8354380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Birth statistics 1993.
    Babb P
    Popul Trends; 1995; (79):31-3. PubMed ID: 7614127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health visitors and birth control advice 1970-71. 1.
    Waite M
    Nurs Times; 1972 Oct; 68(41):Suppl:157-9. PubMed ID: 4646629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fertility reduction in an MCH/family planning program: a model for projection.
    Miller PC; Lapham RJ; Tao L
    Stud Fam Plann; 1975 Jan; 6(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 1114507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.