These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2582766)

  • 1. Life after Webster: the more things change...
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1989 Oct; 53(10):615. PubMed ID: 2582766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Late abortion and technological advances in fetal viability.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 3842806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives. Abortion after Webster.
    Olson EG
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Jul; 43(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10294036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The limited moral significance of 'fetal viability'.
    Fost N; Chudwin D; Wikler D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):10-3. PubMed ID: 7461953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The basic right to life and differential legal life preservation].
    Koch HG
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1994 Mar; 88(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 8178530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal abortion in America: factors in the dynamics of change.
    Cavanagh D
    Lib Life Fam; 1996; 2(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11660386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster.
    Bannon AE; Nigro SA
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions.
    Orentlicher D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
    Kissling F
    Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The concept of brain life: shifting the abortion standard without imposing religious values.
    Cornwell JR
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1987; 23(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 16100797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
    Ching B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wrongful death and the unborn child: should viability be a prerequisite for a cause of action?
    Meade DS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):421-49. PubMed ID: 9693487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Birth after late termination of pregnancy: a neonatologist's point of view].
    Pignotti MS
    Recenti Prog Med; 2007 Oct; 98(10):479-83. PubMed ID: 17970172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. After Roe.
    Neuhaus RJ
    Natl Rev; 1989 Apr; 41(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 11659127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):189-212. PubMed ID: 3333215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second-trimester abortions in the United States.
    Grimes DA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(6):260-6. PubMed ID: 6519237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.