106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2582818)
1. Opting-in versus opting-out: an organ procurement dilemma.
Steuer JD; Bell SK
Crit Care Nurse; 1989 Sep; 9(8):46-56. PubMed ID: 2582818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reversing the protections.
Beauchamp TL
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 8088996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rejecting organs: the organ allocation process and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Whitehead AT
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(4):481-97. PubMed ID: 9876786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Are transplanted organs being allocated unfairly and illegally?
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 10127302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The organ-tissue donation process.
Korsun A
Mt Sinai J Med; 1993 Jan; 60(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8426594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Are we morally obligated to make gifts of our bodies?
Murray TH
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 10121877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Organ donation and transplantation: the need for a multipronged approach for equitable allocation.
Modarress M
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1992; 37(4):549-59. PubMed ID: 10122373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Do we own our bodies?
Calabresi G
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 10121879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the opting-out system on kidney procurement in Singapore.
Soh P; Lim SM
Transplant Proc; 1991 Oct; 23(5):2523. PubMed ID: 1926460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A memorial. Interview by Teddy Osterlin Koch].
Hansen K
Sygeplejersken; 1993 Sep; 93(35):13. PubMed ID: 8178270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal & ethical safeguards: protection of society's most vulnerable participants in a commercialized organ transplantation system.
Banks GJ
Am J Law Med; 1995; 21(1):45-110. PubMed ID: 7573083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of non-heart-beating cadaver donors in clinical organ transplantation--logistics, ethics, and legal considerations.
Anaise D; Rapaport FT
Transplant Proc; 1993 Apr; 25(2):2153-5. PubMed ID: 8385833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Transplantation dilemma: the effort to find organs requires ethical consideration].
Olofsson K
Lakartidningen; 1998 Nov; 95(48):5441-2. PubMed ID: 9854366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fragmented bodies, legal privilege, and commodification in science and medicine.
Perry MM
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2000 Jul; (256):9-49. PubMed ID: 11066591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Problems in the policies and criteria used to allocate organs for transplantation in the United States.
Caplan AL
Transplant Proc; 1989 Jun; 21(3):3381-7; discussion 3413-8. PubMed ID: 2741201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Procurement and transplantation of organs. Judicial and ethical aspects].
Penneau M
Rev Prat; 1999 Jun; 49(11):1203-6. PubMed ID: 10416353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Give the relatives time to decide about organ donation].
Welin S
Lakartidningen; 1999 Feb; 96(5):450-1. PubMed ID: 10064926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Our bodies, our families. The family's role in organ donation.
Dougherty CJ
Second Opin; 1993 Oct; 19(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 10129972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Presumed consent to organ donation: a reevaluation.
Mehlman MJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):31-66. PubMed ID: 10121878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Presumed consent: the solution to the critical organ donor shortage?
Futterman LG
Am J Crit Care; 1995 Sep; 4(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 7489043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
