These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25828379)

  • 1. Towards source level evaluation of the evidential value of fibre examinations.
    Vooijs C; Vergeer P; van der Weerd J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 May; 250():57-67. PubMed ID: 25828379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prevalence of two 'commonly' encountered synthetic target fibres within a large urban environment.
    Palmer R; Burnett E; Luff N; Wagner C; Stinga G; Carney C; Sheridan K
    Sci Justice; 2015 Mar; 55(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 25753995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of tape type, taping method and tape storage temperature on the retrieval rate of fibres from various surfaces: An example of data generation and analysis to facilitate trace evidence recovery validation and optimisation.
    Jones ZV; Gwinnett C; Jackson ARW
    Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):268-291. PubMed ID: 31054817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The individuality of fibres used to provide forensic evidence--not all blue polyesters are the same.
    Grieve MC; Biermann TW; Schaub K
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15739688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence.
    Hepler AB; Saunders CP; Davis LJ; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):129-40. PubMed ID: 22297142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blocks of colour IV: the evidential value of blue and red cotton fibres.
    Biermann TW
    Sci Justice; 2007 Sep; 47(2):68-87. PubMed ID: 17941327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding Y haplotype matching probability.
    Brenner CH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):233-43. PubMed ID: 24315614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian networks and the value of the evidence for the forensic two-trace transfer problem.
    Gittelson S; Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Sep; 57(5):1199-216. PubMed ID: 22458915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of the evolution of experimental studies for the interpretation and evaluation of some trace physical evidence.
    Morgan RM; Cohen J; McGookin I; Murly-Gotto J; O'Connor R; Muress S; Freudiger-Bonzon J; Bull PA
    Sci Justice; 2009 Dec; 49(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20120607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dog mitochondrial genome sequencing to enhance dog mtDNA discrimination power in forensic casework.
    Verscheure S; Backeljau T; Desmyter S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():60-8. PubMed ID: 24905334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New perspectives in the use of ink evidence in forensic science: Part III: Operational applications and evaluation.
    Neumann C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):29-42. PubMed ID: 19717252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood ratio methods for forensic comparison of evaporated gasoline residues.
    Vergeer P; Bolck A; Peschier LJ; Berger CE; Hendrikse JN
    Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):401-11. PubMed ID: 25498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraction of the relevant population from a forensic database.
    de Zwart D; van der Weerd J
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jul; 61(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 34172131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication.
    Kloosterman A; Sjerps M; Quak A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():77-85. PubMed ID: 24905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questions, propositions and assessing different levels of evidence: Forensic voice comparison in practice.
    Hughes V; Rhodes R
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):250-257. PubMed ID: 29895456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.