These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25828516)

  • 1. Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.
    Abdulghani HM; Ahmad F; Irshad M; Khalil MS; Al-Shaikh GK; Syed S; Aldrees AA; Alrowais N; Haque S
    Sci Rep; 2015 Apr; 5():9556. PubMed ID: 25828516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Gupta P; Meena P; Khan AM; Malhotra RK; Singh T
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2020; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 33088746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Cognitive levels and Item writing flaws in Medical Pharmacology Internal Assessment Examinations.
    Tariq S; Tariq S; Maqsood S; Jawed S; Baig M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2017; 33(4):866-870. PubMed ID: 29067055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    Kulshreshtha S; Gupta G; Goyal G; Gupta K; Davda K
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Jun; 74(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 38974743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.
    Shaikh S; Kannan SK; Naqvi ZA; Pasha Z; Ahamad M
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 32176343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the impact of specific types of item-writing flaws on student performance and psychometric properties of the multiple choice question.
    Pham H; Besanko J; Devitt P
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():225. PubMed ID: 38089249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.
    Vuma S; Sa B
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 31435208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construction and Writing Flaws of the Multiple-Choice Questions in the Published Test Banks of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Adoption, Caution, or Mitigation?
    Balaha MH; El-Ibiary MT; El-Dorf AA; El-Shewaikh SL; Balaha HM
    Avicenna J Med; 2022 Jul; 12(3):138-147. PubMed ID: 36092385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).
    Agarwal A; Khattak O; Esmaeel SE; Fahmy E; Bayomy NA; Mehmood SI; Mohamed H; Bawadekji A; Alotibi FAJ; Alanazi MSM; Younes A
    Cureus; 2024 Jun; 16(6):e62607. PubMed ID: 39027751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study.
    Abdulghani HM; Sattar K; Ahmad T; Akram A; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249319. PubMed ID: 33780493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.
    Sajjad M; Iltaf S; Khan RA
    Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(5):982-986. PubMed ID: 32704275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
    Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What faculty write versus what students see? Perspectives on multiple-choice questions using Bloom's taxonomy.
    Monrad SU; Bibler Zaidi NL; Grob KL; Kurtz JB; Tai AW; Hortsch M; Gruppen LD; Santen SA
    Med Teach; 2021 May; 43(5):575-582. PubMed ID: 33590781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
    Al Ameer AY
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.