These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25828946)

  • 1. Comparison of macular thickness and inflammatory cytokine levels after microincision versus small incision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Hwang HS; Ahn YJ; Lee HJ; Kim MS; Kim EC
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e189-94. PubMed ID: 25828946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical coherence tomography of macular thickness after biaxial vs coaxial microincision clear corneal cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):990-7. PubMed ID: 19882577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification.
    Wilczynski M; Drobniewski I; Synder A; Omulecki W
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 17191184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of early distance visual acuity in patients after coaxial phacoemulsification through the micro-incision (1.8 mm) and after standard phacoemulsification through the small incision (2.75 mm).
    Orczykowska M; Owidzkaz M; Synder A; Wilczyński M; Omulecki W
    Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 25137913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
    Dosso AA; Cottet L; Burgener ND; Di Nardo S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery.
    Dick HB
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(5):739-50. PubMed ID: 22267455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chen C; Zhu M; Sun Y; Qu X; Xu X
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 25363858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery].
    Yao K; Wang W; Wu W; Tang XJ; Li ZC; Jin CF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 47(10):903-7. PubMed ID: 22321500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
    Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.
    Berdahl JP; Jun B; DeStafeno JJ; Kim T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2091-5. PubMed ID: 19027565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Elkady B; Piñero D; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 19251139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.