122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2582959)
1. Statistical evaluation of cell kinetic data from DNA flow cytometry (FCM) by the EM algorithm.
Baldetorp B; Dalberg M; Holst U; Lindgren G
Cytometry; 1989 Nov; 10(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 2582959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the S phase distribution of flow cytometric DNA histograms by autoradiography and computer algorithms.
Sheck LE; Muirhead KA; Horan PK
Cytometry; 1980 Sep; 1(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 7297344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Studies on cell kinetics in leukemia using flow cytometry].
Yoshida K
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1982 Sep; 57(5):557-71. PubMed ID: 7152463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of resolution reduction on data analysis.
Hunsberger B; Bagwell CB; Herbert D; Bray C; Langweiler M
Cytometry A; 2003 Jun; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12766972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Flow cytophotometry and cell cycle analysis].
Krug H
Acta Histochem Suppl; 1983; 27():43-61. PubMed ID: 6408708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a modeling system for S-phase estimation in breast cancer by flow cytometry.
Dressler LG; Seamer L; Owens MA; Clark GM; McGuire WL
Cancer Res; 1987 Oct; 47(20):5294-302. PubMed ID: 3652035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous measurement of progesterone receptors and DNA indices by flow cytometry: characterization of an assay in breast cancer cell lines.
Graham ML; Bunn PA; Jewett PB; Gonzalez-Aller C; Horwitz KB
Cancer Res; 1989 Jul; 49(14):3934-42. PubMed ID: 2736533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cell-cycle studies by multiparametric automatic scanning of topographically preserved cells in culture.
Colomb E; Kopp F; Spyratos F; Martin PM
Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 2714110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus infection results in Sf9 cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase.
Braunagel SC; Parr R; Belyavskyi M; Summers MD
Virology; 1998 Apr; 244(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 9581791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mathematical methods in flow cytometry: the problem of evaluating DNA histograms of partially synchronous cell populations].
Schmidt W; Langen P; Graetz H; Lehmann W
Acta Biol Med Ger; 1982; 41(9):787-99. PubMed ID: 7164698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA cell cycle analysis of K562 and Ehrlich tumor cells by flow cytometry.
Radu DL; Dolganiuc A; Olinescu A
Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol; 1996; 55(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 9256021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to estimate cell cycle time and growth fraction using bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry data from a single sample.
Eidukevicius R; Characiejus D; Janavicius R; Kazlauskaite N; Pasukoniene V; Mauricas M; Den Otter W
BMC Cancer; 2005 Sep; 5():122. PubMed ID: 16176590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cell cycle analysis by cyclin E + A/DNA multiparameter flow cytometry in exponential growth MOLT-4 cells.
Qin J; Tao D; Shu D; Leng Y; Gong J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2001 Sep; 114(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 11780393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the variation in S phase duration from flow cytometric histograms.
Larsson S; Ryden T; Holst U; Oredsson S; Johansson M
Math Biosci; 2008 May; 213(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 18433802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mathematical evaluation of two parameter flow cytometric histograms.
Scholz KU
Cytometry; 1981 Nov; 2(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 6170498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of systematic errors on the evaluation of the S phase portions from DNA distributions of solid tumors as shown for 328 breast carcinomas.
Haag D; Feichter G; Goerttler K; Kaufmann M
Cytometry; 1987 Jul; 8(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 3622159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of microspectrophotometric and flow cytometric nuclear DNA measurements in adenocarcinomas of the breast.
Fallenius AG; Askensten UG; Skoog LK; Auer GU
Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 3595349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on cell-cycle kinetics of T 47D human breast cancer cells.
Eisman JA; Sutherland RL; McMenemy ML; Fragonas JC; Musgrove EA; Pang GY
J Cell Physiol; 1989 Mar; 138(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 2925799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
