These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25829801)

  • 1. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Gerasimov AN; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 25829801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gerasimov AN; Kostyukova EI; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1545-52. PubMed ID: 26538996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Diyanova SN; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26240476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers.
    Zimba O; Gasparyan AY
    Reumatologia; 2021; 59(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 33707789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?
    Baffy G; Burns MM; Hoffmann B; Ramani S; Sabharwal S; Borus JF; Pories S; Quan SF; Ingelfinger JR
    Am J Med; 2020 Jan; 133(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 31419421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research.
    Beall J
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1511-3. PubMed ID: 27550476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data.
    Severin A; Strinzel M; Egger M; Domingo M; Barros T
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e050270. PubMed ID: 34290071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Koroleva AM; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 34(27):e184. PubMed ID: 31293109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.
    Beall J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 26829665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic and open identification of researchers and authors: focus on open researcher and contributor ID.
    Gasparyan AY; Akazhanov NA; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1453-6. PubMed ID: 25408574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing.
    Kulczycki E; Rozkosz EA; Engels TCE; Guns R; Hołowiecki M; Pölönen J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214423. PubMed ID: 30908515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science.
    Gasparyan AY; Nurmashev B; Udovik EE; Koroleva AM; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 May; 32(5):713-717. PubMed ID: 28378542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A; Dobránszki J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Aug; 23(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 27909954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Crisis of the scientific communication].
    Ramel B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(37):3514-8. PubMed ID: 14531352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
    Tite L; Schroter S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 25275622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis.
    Tropini C; Finlay BB; Nichter M; Melby MK; Metcalf JL; Dominguez-Bello MG; Zhao L; McFall-Ngai MJ; Geva-Zatorsky N; Amato KR; Undurraga EA; Poinar HN; Gilbert JA
    mBio; 2023 Dec; 14(6):e0109123. PubMed ID: 37975666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.
    Barroga EF
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Let's talk about Reviewer Rewards.
    Jackson S
    J Clin Invest; 2019 Feb; 129(2):439. PubMed ID: 30601763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.