These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25830200)

  • 1. Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions.
    Griffith BE
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 28(3):317-45. PubMed ID: 25830200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image-based immersed boundary model of the aortic root.
    Hasan A; Kolahdouz EM; Enquobahrie A; Caranasos TG; Vavalle JP; Griffith BE
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():72-84. PubMed ID: 28778565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method.
    Lee JH; Griffith BE
    J Comput Phys; 2022 May; 457():. PubMed ID: 35300097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic root.
    Flamini V; DeAnda A; Griffith BE
    Theor Comput Fluid Dyn; 2016 Apr; 30(1):139-164. PubMed ID: 26951951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method.
    Griffith BE; Luo X
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 33(12):. PubMed ID: 28425587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stabilization approaches for the hyperelastic immersed boundary method for problems of large-deformation incompressible elasticity.
    Vadala-Roth B; Acharya S; Patankar NA; Rossi S; Griffith BE
    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng; 2020 Jun; 365():. PubMed ID: 32483394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluid-structure interaction of a pulsatile flow with an aortic valve model: A combined experimental and numerical study.
    Sigüenza J; Pott D; Mendez S; Sonntag SJ; Kaufmann TAS; Steinseifer U; Nicoud F
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Apr; 34(4):e2945. PubMed ID: 29181891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Immersed Boundary method with divergence-free velocity interpolation and force spreading.
    Bao Y; Donev A; Griffith BE; McQueen DM; Peskin CS
    J Comput Phys; 2017 Oct; 347():183-206. PubMed ID: 31595090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of valve simplifications on left ventricular hemodynamics in a three dimensional simulation based on in vivo MRI data.
    Imanparast A; Fatouraee N; Sharif F
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 27040387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An approach to the simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve.
    Carmody CJ; Burriesci G; Howard IC; Patterson EA
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 16271600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Vitro Validation of a Numerical Simulation of Leaflet Kinematics in a Polymeric Aortic Valve Under Physiological Conditions.
    Gharaie SH; Mosadegh B; Morsi Y
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Mar; 9(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 29322329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves: Comparison between Immersed Boundary and Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Techniques for the Mesh Representation.
    Bavo AM; Rocatello G; Iannaccone F; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Segers P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154517. PubMed ID: 27128798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve.
    De Hart J; Peters GW; Schreurs PJ; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech; 2003 Jan; 36(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 12485644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a fixed-grid and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods on modelling fluid-structure interaction of the aortic valve.
    Joda A; Jin Z; Summers J; Korossis S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 May; 233(5):544-553. PubMed ID: 30922162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sharp interface Lagrangian-Eulerian method for flexible-body fluid-structure interaction.
    Kolahdouz EM; Wells DR; Rossi S; Aycock KI; Craven BA; Griffith BE
    J Comput Phys; 2023 Sep; 488():. PubMed ID: 37214277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A design-based model of the aortic valve for fluid-structure interaction.
    Kaiser AD; Shad R; Hiesinger W; Marsden AL
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Dec; 20(6):2413-2435. PubMed ID: 34549354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A patient-specific aortic valve model based on moving resistive immersed implicit surfaces.
    Fedele M; Faggiano E; Dedè L; Quarteroni A
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Oct; 16(5):1779-1803. PubMed ID: 28593469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation the effect of geometry and position of polymeric heart valves on hemodynamic with fluid-structure interaction numerical method.
    Farokhi EA; Niroomand-Oscuii H; Yazdanpanah K
    Med Eng Phys; 2021 Nov; 97():10-17. PubMed ID: 34756333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations.
    Howard IC; Patterson EA; Yoxall A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(6):259-66. PubMed ID: 14602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.